Date:   10/1/2007 10:54:13 AM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   10,364
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1011513

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

There is still not any proof that the UZ is any more effective. I have never heard from any one who has tried the UZ and compared it to any other zappers.

While your zapper might be more beneficial to those with certain illnesses, this is unproven and there are potential serious consequences.

You expound on electroporation as it it were all good. Sadly, it is not good and can have disasterous consequences. The main use of electroporation is for the introduction or transport of foreign substances into cells. According to Wikipedia and many scientific sources, electroporation is "highly efficient for the introduction of foreign genes in tissue culture cells, especially mammalian cells."

Electroporation can be dangerous.


As for your post on Dr. Lloyd's analysis of UZ, it is technically contradictory and I doubt that it would have come from Dr. LLoyd.

"true square wave form and would therefore produce harmonics in both odd and even number frequency range."

#1 - the square wave contains only odd integer harmonics.

#2 - A true square wave has a 50% duty cycle - equal high and low periods.

The information is incorrect. Your zapper does not produce a true square wave and a square wave does not provide even harmonics.

It does however produce 2 separate set of harmonics (both are odd). However, each set of harmonics is only half the strength of what a true square wave would produce.


 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.06 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=1011513