Re: a lot of thoughts (and applicable questions) Re: Excessive????

>>There is a finite amount of information available, and in my estimation, it was largely exhausted months ago.<<

I disagree with your estimation. As long as people are experiencing various results (positive & negative) with Iodine supplementation, there is a contantly changing/flowing amount of information.

>>I've posted links from internet sources & opinions and had discussions re Iodine with some other folks for some time, and frankly am fatigued from the volume of discussions.<<

I'm sorry you're fatigued, but when you choose to become a forum owner, it came along with the responsibility of constantly being available to answer questions and be involved in the 'volume of discussions'...along with the "hit gaining" videos & o/t banter.

>>True healers and true pioneers, within that definition, don't exist.<<

Maybe they don't exist in the world of scientific allopathic medicine (or in within a limited range of perception), but true healing pioneers that constantly learn & improve upon their theories & treatments have existed throughout all eras & time.

>>Even well-funded companies such as Merck don't always see everything, and they have the best staff in the world !<<

Merck has the best staff in the world? (that would be the pharamceutical giant of Merck & Co., Inc - the global research pharmaceutical company dedicated to putting patients first, Merck? or merckvaccines.com?) 'Tis statements like that which cause lil' ole me to wonder all KINDS of things about you and holistic health & healing.

>>I'd like to see one example where anyone was ever able to examie all sides of every substance and protocol, the propensity for.....every aspect of the human body. Their modus operandi would serve as a good model for all to emulate. To my knowledge, no perfect system exists; the human body hasn't been figured out completely, yet. Plus, even the best people sometimes make mistakes and oversights. Lots of effects aren't always known or foreseeable up front.<<

Perhaps you haven't researched and read the devoted works of healers and innovaters like Rife? Reich? Gerson? Kelley? Christopher? Great healers that were constantly reexaming and redefining their own theories and truths...and did so until they were crushed by the Powers That Be, killed or had their life's research totally destroyed.

>>To my knowledge, no perfect system exists; the human body hasn't been figured out completely, yet. Plus, even the best people sometimes make mistakes and oversights. Lots of effects aren't always known or foreseeable up front<<

To my understanding and way of thinking, 'twas a typical response full of allopathic/scientific BS and propaganda. It's impossible to figure out the human body completely using the 'sick science' we have now. Biological principles governed by Newtonian physics (that don't allow or take into account the forces of energy throughout the body that can't be 'measured' on scientific equipment); limited microbiological theories that don't address the truths of somatids (Pasteur's 'theory' accepted as a foundation of health (when he himself claimed it was false)
For sure, the oversights and mistakes will continue until "science" adopts a foundation of truth.

>>And no reasonable person would or should expect an internet forum containing links to articles by MD's, other internet-based documents, and a few anectodal experiences to comprise the work of a True Healer within the definition you've put forth. That's why every page has reference to the TOS, which basically states that none of what's on here is medical advice.<<

A reasonable person would totally understand that those disclaimers are forced to be in place by the FDA...OR that they're every lame persons excuse for giving out all kinds of egoic, self-serving advice that makes them feel important, but they run and hide behind the disclaimer if their advice is shown to be wrong or it has a negative impact. A person with a true heart for healing would NEVER hide behind a disclaimer or utilize it as an excuse for their actions or advice.

>>Penicillin was a miracle at the time of its discovery, and remains a potent and viable anti-biotic, but it's not a cure-all.<<

It was only a miracle to those whose knowledge of the less harmful substances that accomplished the same thing was limited, hidden or they chose not to see. H202 healed a higher percentage of pneumonia cases during WWI than penicillin ever did...yet it did it without side-effects, damage to the human body, or creating super germs. Colloidal Silver also yielded very similar results. Both were abandoned due to their lack of profitability...that doesn't make penicillin a miracle drug, it makes it a third choice, weak at best. I'm surprised to learn you didn't know these basic facts about CS and H2O2...perhaps your "scientific" education is more limiting than expected.

Out of time here...the rest is inconsequential to my thinking anyway.

Uny Tweet