Oh, I did not notice that you said you agreed with
Trapper. I noticed that you EDITED the post I was
responding to, to make it clear that you were agreeing
with Trapper. The original post did not reflect that
sentiment and so trying to misrepresent my reaction
is not going to work...if anything, it only served
to force you to EDIT your post to reflect your true
I do not want to go to war with you....I'd lose...lol
since I am not a fighter and you are...
If a post gets moved to debate, more power to the mods.
I have no problem with that. That whole situation came
from you being un-supportive and debating in a support
forum...end of argument there...it went where it needed
to go and if your feelings were hurt because I called
you a bully...well, get over it...and besides, I did not
post a post about Bush being a crime family in news. I
would only post that in debate if I were to post a post
like that. I was replying to a post Detour posted...and
it said merely that I was not sure whether to laugh or
I did not have frustrations about any of the postings.
I leave it to others to move or delete or give R's or
what have you. Trapper did ask the Webmaster to look into
the situation (which I see as a crossposting issue) and I
agree with him.
It does makes me groan to see something like a Freddy Mercury
or an article about Van Gogh in breaking Health News and
I seriously doubt I am alone. It is not you, it is the
cross-posting which I have always said had its blindspots.
This sort of stuff being one.
Ultimately, there needs to be clarification or a way
to get posters to use the cross-posting more appropriately.