Re: Axis Shift

 Chemtrails are much more controversial than Global Warming.  Why? 

However controversial these two topics actually are, do you suppose the chemtrail topic would would remain as controversial if  A) it had been loudly trumpeted and smeared all over and through the media during the recent years in the effort to raise people's awareness of the topic?; B) had a concerted global effort working on it's behalf by way of so-called experts from around the globe having recently convened for the purpose of issuing their proclamation that the topic is what they say it is regardless of evidence to the contrary and regardless of dissenting opinion?

In multiple ways, Chemtrails V Global Warming are and have been at opposite ends of the attention/awareness spectrum. They have certainly been at opposite ends of media attention, the former getting little to no attention with the exception generally being those few occasions when a media outlet uses their airwaves to mention Chemtrails only as a pretext for characterizing as looney, fanatical, unstable crazy people those who claim that Chemtrails are a significant problem. Meanwhile, global warming has benefited  from the opposite effect; anyone who has the opinion that global warming is not the problem it's been manufactured into being, anyone who refuses to accept the establishment agenda on global warming, anyone who dissents or disagrees with the establishment agenda for global warming is immediately characterized as a looney, fanatical, unstable crazy person.  Even the Weather Channel's expert meteorlogical executive  Ms Heidi is on public record recently stating as much and qualifying with her own opinion (paraphrased) "any person who dissents or disagrees with the establishment agenda on Global Warming should be put in jail!". As if this kind of media thinking is not scarey enough, since hearing Ms Heidi issue that proclamation, I've actually bumped into a few people who claim to support that kind of thinking....... ? 

Can you cite one sample period of time that you can definitely remember the topic of Chemtrails being given adequate, thorgouh and fair attention via the press/media? An unspoken message I get is that by having characterized Chemtrails as "controversial", that what you really mean to say is that the topic "should be dismissed..... because it's controversial...duh".  It does not seem fair to dismiss/characterize a topic as "controversial" simply because it it a topic generally ignorred, played down and mostly not ever talked about via the public airwaves. Again, the opposite effect has been in play with Global Warming; the mass public attention & treatment it's been given has not been genuine, has not been fair, but has occured in large part by way of decree..... it is what we say it is and that's that!