Re: Angie Rhoads response to the "20/20" on M****tech

I agree with your statement. I don't doubt that there are benefits from glycos. "Give the Devil his due" is right. Their "rap", from what I have witnessed, is a little bit more hysterical than simply a "sales pitch." Marketing is the American way, I understand that. This blind, cult-like approach is absurd. These are people who converge on others with newly diagnosed, serious diseases, and convince them that these products have "cured" others with the same disease, get them to try them, then buy them, then sell them, so they can use the testimonials. Then they sell it. Helps to offset the expense of treatment! Then they get so hyped, they abandon all conventional treatment, with scientific studies, I might add, and sometimes this decision shortens their life. This has happened to me. Maybe that is why I feel SO strondly. I have seen it again and again, and have buried a family member, who, by the way, still has her beautifully written testimonial floating around out there in MT propaganda. But then, we are all going to die, and we well all die from lack of oxygen. I simply think this approach is highly unethical, based on getting rich, and it is totally NOT the American way. I was flabergasted that they could be allowed to continue this practice. I am relieved, regardless the outcome, that the Texas Attorney General finally filed suit against them last week. It restores some of my faith in justice. Tweet