CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Iodine,the DEA and the New Regulations_Update
 
  Views: 1,548
Published: 17 y
 
This is a reply to # 861,722

Re: Iodine,the DEA and the New Regulations_Update


The 2%, is not only a misplaced modifier, but is mis-descriptive of the product and introduces a contradiction, as any person of ordinary skill in the chemical arts readily recognizes. I myself would neither buy, nor recommend any product so labeled.

Since Lugol's solution is 15% iodine, then 2% of that is onlyl 0.3%

I think it is misleading from the standpoint that if a person or literature source recommends Lugol's solution for a particular end use, the vast majority of the public would be led to believe that "Lugol's 2% USP" fits the bill, when in fact, it does not.


 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.076 sec, (1)