Censorship?

"... hope that we aren't trying to sensor opinions and limit information. In the end we make our own choices."

Ever see what happens to "opposing" info that questions validity of MH's protocols in MH's forum. It either vanishes or it is gangbanged by the faithful. All the protocols are defended with religious fevor by the big mysterious book that is so secret, noone else can get a copy. Hmmmmmmm.

What you see here in *this* thread are opposing views...hardly censorship.

When people initially voiced their opinions of having MH start his forum (actually it was another fellow herbal marketer who initiated the idea of the forum), any opposing view was indeed censored, (vanished) while views that shouted rah rah, were maintained(allowed to remain).

Not only is that censorship but bias.

Now when posts are edited due to blatant name calling that is a different matter. Some civility must be maintained, but freindly questioning there is met with stubborn hostility. Not condusive for the eploration of good information.


©†ƒ……•™¼‡_Original_Message_¾€š½ž¢«»¬ï°©

"... hope that we aren't trying to sensor opinions and limit information. In the end we make our own choices."

Ever see what happens to "opposing" info that questions validity of MH's protocols in MH's forum. It either vanishes or it is gangbanged by the faithful. All the protocols are defended with religious fevor by the big mysterious book that is so secret, noone else can get a copy. Hmmmmmmm.

What you see here in *this* thread are opposing views...hardly censorship.

When people initially voiced their opinions of having MH start his forum (actually it was Jcounts a fellow herbal marketer who initiated the idea of the forum), any opposing view was indeed censored, (vanished) while views that shouted rah rah, were maintained(allowed to remain).

Not only is that censorship but propogandized bias.

Tweet