Re: Parazapper and I the same person?? I think not...

It may do the square off set wave, but is that part improved at all or minimized to push the frequencies? It sounds to me it's only the frequencies you really care about, though like a Rife machine. But the square positive offset wave is the critical part. Why did you choose to focus on the frequencies, not improving the intensity of the Clark battery one? And didn't you say you don't use that 555 chip anymore?

'Since ParaZapper uses a stronger, more advanced chip that the regular 555 timer' and her son invented the zapper, not the chip. Never said he did---so Dr. Clark was still the expert on using a zapper.

And you really don't know if it's killed them all inside the body. You base your info on a microscope environment, it sounds like.

And why would Dr. Clark not find the ones you say you know it didn't kill? She found it killed them all (maybe your unkilled ones weren't human pathogens and for that reason not as vulnerable to being zapped?)--and she was very good at using her sycrometer. It's a manual device that requires the user know how to use it, just like a violin--just because you can play notes on it (and very wrong notes indeed), doesn't mean a violin isn't a very usable instrument in the hands of a master.

I don't know how the tech's advanced since then, but there probably digital versions, not so difficult to play nowadays. I don't think you have that level of expertise. I finally got mine to work with hours of practice. But I never got a resonance for something that wasn't there. And I'm sure she'd have said 'it kills everything except blah and blah'--she had no problem saying how it couldn't reach every where.

So how many frequencies does your units typically generate with all the added resonant ones? Anywhere near 525?

Sorry parazapper, I'm just feeling something is off about that design. Tweet