Re: Women: open to non-sexual relationships?

I know ordinary men (those who have not transcended their animalistic urges) will never agree with this. That is what is wrong with the world. And sometimes there is a role reversal. It is rare. But once in a while a man will realize WTF he is doing, transcend, and his wife will leave him for someone who will have sex with her more frequently and make her feel more secure in the relationship. All that is why society remains in an eternal gridlock insuring there are plenty of ordinary folks, usually women, ("ordinary" meaning those who are so desperate for "love" in the form of security) that they will be "happy" (only relatively speaking) to enable men's prime ordinary pursuit (sex must happen or else, because that what the almighty penis wants, and everything else is secondary), and unwittingly willingly remain slaves to the god almighty king guru penis, cow towing to it's perceived supreme urges. That is why this world is in the condition is it in. There are too few transcended male egos capable of co-creating a sacred container for genuinely sacred sexual involvement to occur. There is nothing wrong with accepting that you are not capable of supporting yourself without adopting a caninely human companion and establishing a comfortable life that is dedicated to satisfying sexual urges, unless you have spiritual sexual aspirations. there is nothing wrong with NOT having spiritual sexual aspirations. There is nothing wrong with seeking a mate who is willing to put your sexual urges first and submit to them whenever your testosterone beckons. There is nothing wrong with being such a good provider that you can eliminate potential distractions that could give your selected mate a legitimate reason to postpone sexual relations for a day or two. But there is something of a finer vibrational quality (by "fine" I am referring to speed and distance, that is all), that can be attained. My intention is not to insult or degrade. It is usually, however), the mate that "sacrifices" personal preferences for the sake of genital expression, who lives the shortest life, for whatever that factual information is worth. Tweet