Re: zappicator... nonsense ?

OK, I have to agree unless the final output is somehow improved to make it more effective.

Dr. Rife claimed that to produce the best results, the frequency had to be within 0.05 percent of the required value ( the MOR ).

Since the Clark zapper is only about +/- 10 percent for any specific frequency, only about 1 percent of the zappers is actually going to hit the required frequency.

Some zappers are worse, even up to +/- 20 percent.

ParaZapper CC2 is better as they are +/- 0.25 percent ( not actually meeting the accuracy requirement, but far closer than any regular 555 timer based zapper made ).

The ParaZapper MY, however, does meet the 0.05 percent accuracy requirement and for most frequencies it is about 0.01 percent.

Does this guarantee that it actually hits the MOR of any organism on the list? Yes, ParaZapper MY will hit any frequency on the list that is included in the MY by 0,05 percent or better. What this means is that if the list is correct and accurate, then EVERY single ParaZapper MY will produce the same effect, not just 1 out of 100 or 1 out of 300.

david1o1 has been using those 1 out of 100 or even 1 out of 1000 zappers, so who knows what results he should expect or get. In that case, I can not blame him for his skepticism but at the same time, he should at least try a product before criticizing it over thing that he is not knowledgeable on. I am not saying this to make a sale, it is his unfairness that he brings to the table through his claims and accusations.

Tweet