Hulda Clark's main shortcoming

The main shortcoming of Hulda Clark was not her detailed and very well documented work , but more in her verbal delivery to the public, IMHO. I never was impressed with her, until I delved deeply into her writings. Her methods are very comprehensive and even quite complicated to an extent. It is the combination of methods that really adds up to great effect. You will never get the details of what she really recommends with sound bite videos of her speaking or through short posts, because there is so much detail it literally fills volumes. To quote one short passage in the HIV/AIDS book:
"There are four ways to kill the intestinal fluke: an herbal way, electrical zapper way, the homeographic way, and simple starvation. Neither can do a perfect job by itself. Yet a good job must be done. so it is best to use all four ways of killing them."
No one method does the job thoroughly enough. Although I am a very strong advocate of zapping, all methods should be used to eliminate parasites and disease. Her claim (and it makes perfect sense) is that larger parasites will carry various viruses in and on them throughout the body. You want to destroy all these parasites, which carry inside other viruses, if you want to eliminate all disease from the body.
Some of the new zappers, with many accurate frequencies, are likely to be much stronger in destroying these parasites, but ALL methods should be used. Her books are required reading. Tweet