Re: Soapstones

 Your soap stone term is something that Liver Flush deniers invented to explain phenomena they obviously don't fully understand and are unwilling to admit as such.

What is funny is how the "liver flush" supporters keep projecting their shortcoming on to others.  If they are being hypocritical they blame the other person for being hypocritical.  If they cannot provide any proof to their claims they claim the other person has not presented any evidence even if tons of evidence has been presented..........

Here we have another example.  The "liver flush" supporters clearly have no concept of what "liver flushing" really is or how it is even supposed to work.  So once again they project their shortcoming on to the people who do understand the difference between a gallbladder and a liver, how large amounts of oil do affect the gallbladder, how fecal soaps are formed, how sterol-cholesterol complexes are formed, how gallstones really form, what they really look like and their other properties, etc..........

As for the "liver flush" supporters cannot win even a simple debate."

The Liver flush Supporters already won by the first successful liver flush, where a persons constitution was altered to one of proper bowel movement following a Liver flush. Mission accomplished.

First of all doing a flush is not a debate.  So you just lost again by lack of evidence.

Secondly, in order for a "liver flush" to be successful you would have to have cleared the gallbladder of gallstones.  Or if you prefer the liver of liver stones, which are extremely rare.  So where is your proof that you passed gallbladder or liver stones and there were actually such and not fecal soaps?  Remember that debate is about evidence, not made up claims or false assumptions.