Re: to RyanD

I am not denouncing anything, I am only looking at the evidence as a whole. The study you mentioned was refuted a great deal. Here is one source.

http://www.norm-uk.org/circumcision_hiv.html


No Medical association recommends circumcision. They have looked at arguments for and against it. No one is trying to victimize you for your position.

STDs and infections are not significantly reduced by circumcision. That is the conclusion of every Medical association.

You can find a few people to support you with their circumcision experience and some studies as well but they are few and it is not enough to persuade most doctors or me or a lot of people who have looked at most of the evidence out there.

I half way expected to find at least one guy on youtube who would say circumcision was great for him but i got nothing as opposed to a hundred guys who flat out hated it.

I find anonymous guys blogging about how circumcision is good which really makes me wonder. Why do the studies and reports for circumcision seem biased and have holes in them when subjected to pier review?

You can be juvenile and insult me or deal with the facts, I don't care. Tweet