Re: Let's just agree that never the twain shall meet on some of our views
Ah, you are indeed a legend in your own mind,
ROTFLMAO!!!!! Funny coming from the egotist that says he is right up there with a bunch of famous authors, but can do simple research worth beans. Talk about a legend in his own mind.
But hey this is typical Tony. Cannot respond with real evidence so instead he responds with real insults. Of course if history repeats itself he will try to place all the blame on me again then try to play victim.
Yes, anybody can write anything but that does not make it factual. Such as writing that viruses cause most cancer or that mostly GMO soy is safe.
Thing is that I have proven over and over that viruses are a major cause of cancer and the medical establishment also believes this. But of course this proves your claims wrong as usual so right on cue you start with the insults to divert the attention away from the fact that you were proven wrong AGAIN!!! Doesn't it get tiring not getting anything right Tony? All you have to do is learn how to do proper research and you can start getting things right for once. I have even offered several times to help you lean to do proper research. I guess you feel being wrong is something you are god at so you are going to stick to it.
As for GMO soy I never said GMO soy was safe. I have discussed the myths behind soy itself. So now you are resorting to distorting statements in order to plead your case. A clear sign of desperation!!!
Just like a person can write anything, so can a person find studies to back up just about anything - especially when they do like you do and take studies which show links between cancer and viruses and use that to support the premise that viruses cause most cancer when most of the studies say no such thing.
Actually the studies do say this. You apparently did not read the studies or did not understand them. Nothing new there either.
Making a case against my research skills? Maybe in your mind, but not in reality. I challenge you to show me one single instance where I ever attempted to research links between viruses and cancer.
ROTFLMAO!!! You just proved me right!!!! You are admitting that you never researched the link between viruses and cancer even though that was EXACTLY what the topic was about. So you clearly have no clue how to research the topics at hand, which explains why you found nothing on the subject when I found all sorts of evidence to back the fact in no time. I suppose if you were looking for information on oranges that you would look under "lemons".
I have long known that some viruses can cause cancer and that some viruses are linked to higher incidence of cancer. None of which prove in the least that viruses actually cause most cancers.
Again you have to actually read and understand the research, which exists unlike your claims that most cancers are caused from poor cellular terrain, toxicity and radiation. Where are those medical studies backing your claims Tony? You asked me where the studies were linking viruses to cancer and I provided a large number of studies, which is only a tiny fraction of what is out there. So you should do the same when asked and provide the research to back your claims. Oh that's right, you can't provide what does not exist!!!
Since you apparently want to antagonistically debate this already debated subject yet again, I will now move the thread you are hijacking (the same as you have so many others) to the appropriate debate forum.
That's it, hide your lack of knowledge on the subject by moving it where less people will see it. Again typical Tony. By the way Tony, it takes two to debate and you are the one that keeps debating the evidence and failing to provide anything to back your arguments against the evidence. So stop with the blame games when you are the one being antagonistic.