Re: A convenient change in forum distinctions?

 That is what the Liver Flush Support Forum is for.  This is a DEBATE BOARD.  How many times does that fact have to be repeated before the liver flush supporters figure that out?

Since when did you make any distinctions between proper decorum on support versus debate forums?  Such distinctions have not stopped you from prolonged debates and personal attacks in the past.

You really need to get your facts straight before posting such garbage.  First of all I NEVER attack anyone unless attacked first.  So all you are doing is blaming the victim instead of the real perpetrators.  Secondly if the debate was prolonged then others were involved.  I am not engaging in prolonged debates with myself.  So to single me out when the LF supporters keep coming back to continue the debates jsut goes to show your intense prejudice against me but not anyone who shares your views.  In fact, your post is part of keeping this prolonged debate going!!!  So if you have a complaint give it to the person staring back at you in the mirror!!!

You obviously did not get the message (or else ignored the message) when you were making all your negative and disruptive posts against liver flushes and flushees in the Liver Flush Support forum until you were ultimately banned from it. 

Again you do not have all your facts straight.  I questioned some claims asking for some evidence.  That is not debate within itself.  If the doctor goes to give you a drug is it debate if you ask the doctor what it is for, if it will really work or if it is really needed?  Asking questions does not necessarily constitute debate.  But the moderator saw it as a questioning of their authority.  Kind of like when a parent asks a child to do something and the child asks "why?".   People in positions of power generally  do not like feeling as if their authority or beliefs are being questioned.  Unfortunately there are way too many immature people here on CZ that have not figured out that asking questions is not a challenge or debate.  So they are quick on the draw to ban people rather than addressing the questions to set an example to anyone else who may dare to question the claims.

As I recall, the moderator of this forum had to make you clean up your act in this forum in order to not be banned here as well.

I don't recall that at all.  Do you have proof f this?  And if this is true then how many of the LF supporters got the same warning for their actions?

And now you want to cry foul when people don't conform to your concept of what a debate forum should be?  Or pull out the old "victim card"  and claim TOS violations when they question your actions?

See the above comments.  By the way the moderator needs to send you a warning for posting off topic and for making an individual the target of your post, which are TOS violations.  See, two can play at your game.