Re: The Coming American Revolution

Well examined Spudlydoo.

In addition to the follow the money trail, in who's interest does this information exist, and so on, my great hesitation in all this deluge of information is almost all of it is not original. As you state, so much of it is just cut and pasted, repeated, plagiarized information that has no relationship to it being original. Repeaters of this kind of information are little more then human reindexers. I have Google and Bing to do that for me.

Unless someone was 'there' or directly involved of whatever an event is, or is directly involved as a result of an aftermath of an event, at the very least one can expect to be no closer than three degrees of separation from an actual event. And this is being generous. What happens when we point to, quote, get our information from, a site that is already three or four degrees separated from an actual 'thing' themselves? That places us, the repeaters of this information, 4, 5, hell, more degrees of separation from it.

And then, what if the repeated information, is wrong?! Or better, a lie?

Think about it. Being so far separated from an actual event, yet one wishes to point to it, report on it, as if it were true. I for one would be very suspect of anything that comes across these wires. And it is not main stream media, or TPTB, or the Rockefellers or Bilderbergs or the whoevers that Conspiracy people want to believe are fomenting this. It is we, the people. We become the very thing we rail against. We are, them.

The next time someone says "I know someone", I'm going to slap them. If you are 3, 4, 5 degrees of separation from an event, and you start to point to it, take it at face value, repeat it as real, pause. Actually, don't pause. Go ahead. Believe it. Repeat it. And you will be just like the "them", whoever the "thems" are.

Or, you can write one true thing. No one has responded to this point yet.
Tweet