Re: Terminal Liver Cancer

I would say that cancer could be looked at as a survival mechanism in that it usually develops as a cellular response to inflammation (as well as certain fast acting carcinogens such as some highly carcinogenic viruses and toxins and very high doses of radiation).  Where I differ from Moritiz is that I do not consider cancer to be a response by the overall body, but rather by individual cells.

Cancer can be considered a disease as well, but not in the sense that it is an illness which can be caught from someone else. Someone may catch a disease or virus from someone else that utlimately creates conditions that lead to cancer, but they don't directly catch cancer. If such were the case, the friends, family members and health care workers would be coming down with cancer left and right.

Whatever it is that comes out as "stones" from a liver flush, the value of cleansing, protecting and helping regenerate the liver, and keeping the bile ducts open and flowing, is of paramount importance in beating and avoiding cancer - and doubly so when there is cancer in the liver itself.  The late great cancer pioneer Max Gerson observed that he never found a single cancer patient who did not also have an impaired liver.

I would suppose that the Hulda Clark parasite protocol might be successful for the same reason that treating for viral infections might help some people beat cancer.  Though such treatments may be intended for parasites and viruses, they also may be beneficial against cancer, which is neither a parasite or a virus.