Re: Fraud (edit)

>- success rate is much higher—closer to 60 percent, and in some cases as high as 75 percent.

Show me the studies. It is easy to put things in a book without much basis. I will review an actual study to see for myself how well it was done and how valid it is.

>- That's a laugh and a rationalization.

Only on your part, I have confirmed this with an MD.

>- You fail to address the fact that Hulda treated her brother's cancer and he died

No, I have no information on this perspective.

>- That is not the book I was referring to.

Actually, that was an error, the book is "Remarkable Recovery". I had to leave in a hurry to run some errands and did not proofread.

>- The reason the material is tested in minute detail is to determine the type of cancer and the possible extent of it.

I am very well aware of this as I have experience of this as well as having cultured cancer cells.

>- You read a different book than I did because Hulda claimed that each cancer has a internal fluke.

No, I read several of her books but did not remember that statement.

>- You're still lying.

Again, you are not correct. My statements are true as I showed before.

>- You are still living in the medical Dark Ages.

No, I am not at all. I have in my closet an entire cancer history, including MRI's, CAT scans, PET scans (for bone metastases), Blood tests, etc. Not only do I have these, I know how to read them. I know what the blood test mean.

Also, I diagnosed my own cancer, even as to type, before I went to the doctor for confirmation. I ended up having to treat myself because they failed. So far with the blessings of my creator, I am still here.

>- Again, nary a fluke related to cancer has ever been found in North America and you concept of knee jerk diagnosis is really really sad, totally ill-informed, and way out of date.

Again, you are mistaken and do not know what you are talking about. Just because you don't know about it, does not mean that it does not exist. There are cases in the US where the liver fluke has been found in cancer patients, but again they are rarely reported or published.

What you fail to understand is that everyone who gets cancer, dies. Everyone who does not get cancer dies. Those who go through traditional oncological treatment die much sooner. Most oncologist would not take chemo or radiation for most cancers.

Oncology ranks cancers with a 5 year survival rate. The reason for this is that at about 7 years, you have a better chance of survival if you do not follow traditional chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.

What you and the traditioanal medical establishment fail to realize is the how and why of cancer growth being enabled by flukes and other parasites.