If we label people with hiv who don't get sick "long term nonprogressors" we don't have to question our theories, because they have a genetic mutation
It's a convenient way to explain things that go against their medical model
How is it "convenient"? Have you actually read the literature on why some people progress more quickly than others? It's a lot more complicated than CCR5d32 (although that's the most commonly discussed one)? I'm still not catching your point. Perhaps you could speak about the science, rather than the politics...
What are you suggesting the Science actually means?