so, which Iodine is he recommending?

i find a lot in his video to love and hate. and i used to love a good sales pitch when i was in advertising. now i want only the truth but the truth is expensive. it takes time and effort to consume and arrange properly in ones thinking. most folks would rather let someone else do it for them and thats impossible.

i will say he got one thing right - Iodine is as important as oxygen. and he does seem to have a pretty good program overall. low dosing is a trap and a self fulfilling prophecy. but jumping into it blind is also not good. after 5 years on this forum we still fight the same battles. the main one - everybody is afraid of Iodine and fear is always a killer.

The good doctor is referring to Iodine made according to E. C. reading 358-2 (at least it was about 10 years ago when I observed it being made in Florida). Long and complex story here, I was once good friend and customer of the owner and supplied this product to my missionary friends in Zambia. When he refused to change his manufacturing to the much harder and more complex 358-1 reading, I undertook this project myself. Once the missionary had the Iodine in the nascent state he said no more of the cheap stuff. It is 10 times as hard to make than the easy way for non nascent iodine. The easy Iodine worked okay for mild malaria. It was not consistent and we had to throw some away as not changed at all.
In 1931 E.C. advised Dr. Sunkar A. Bisey to put his iodine through a huge electromagnetic field for a long period of time in a small quantity (358-1). The scientific world had realized that Dr. Bisey had achieved the atomic state of iodine or nascent state or iodine as an atom (not an ion or molecule) in a consumable state, in 1928. 358-1 would be even better according to E. C. but Bisey said it was too expensive to hard for sure. He called his product Atomidine. This is not to be confused with a product by the same name made of iodine trichloride today. Bisey's manufacturing process was lost sometime after his death in 1935, as the company changed hands many times.
I had the time and money to develop 358-1 and decided it was worth the effort. When it reached the hands of the missionary I knew that we had achieved the nascent state. Universities and Mass Spectrometers confirmed what the missionary and malaria had told us. This is indeed a different type of iodine. Detoxified (358-2) is better than no processing at all but it is not in the nascent state ( as in 358-1).
Sorry for the long story but it has been a long effort for sure, still well worth it considering those in Zambia and India helped with malaria.