Yes, I think that is the case. If you listen to what he says, he constantly contradicts himself about oxygen and candida, as well as putting forth many inaccurate statements about candida and system-wide body responses.

He states that candida is an anaerobic organism that is killed by oxygen. That is a half-truth compounded with a gross inaccuracy. I don't think it's a lie, just a complete misunderstanding of Candida albicans. Candida is a facultative anaerobe, which means it can live in an oxygen-rich or an oxygen-poor environment. The fact that he misses this very essential fact about candida is disturbing.

DWQuote:
"Candida albicans is an anaerobic organism. That means it doesn’t like oxygen. Candida is destroyed by raising the oxygen level of the blood. Candida suppresses your immune system over time."

He states that oxygen kills candida, but later states that candida thrives in the lungs and blood, the two most oxygen-rich environments in the body, and then later states that oxygen in the blood kills candida. He goes back and forth multiple times.


DWQuote:
"But really, Oxygen therapy or raising the oxygen level of the blood to over 96% saturation is the best way we have found to control systemic candida, after we do that and that takes 6-7 weeks depending,..."

The normal oxygen level of the blood in individuals is 95-99% or 96-100% depending on which source you cite. In essence, his product doesn't demonstrate improvement when that is the normal level. Levels below 95% are not common, although when confronted with this information, he would probably claim that he routinely finds them below those levels.

DWQuote:
"We often recommend reducing refined sugars and starches during our detoxification and cleansing program, it’s not necessary but we often recommend it, simply because it makes the individual feel better physically.
However, we’ve tested our detoxification, our Oxyflush program, on people who ate a high sugar diet, candy bars and soft drinks, and the program still works. Diet does not have a direct influence in this problem."

Candida is resistant to hydrogen peroxide. It contains genes, enzymes, and cell-signaling molecules that promote this resistance. Glucose enhances the peroxide resistance of Candida albicans - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2777113/?tool=pmcentrez


"Glucose significantly increased the resistance of C. albicans to high doses of oxidative stress (>10 mM hydrogen peroxide)."

"the C. albicans homologue of S. cerevisiae Yap1 was not required for glucose-enhanced peroxide resistance (Figure 8)."

"glucose still increased the resistance of these Ras1 cells to peroxide, indicating that this effect was not dependent upon Ras-cAMP signaling."

So, not only does Candida albicans already demonstrate resistance to hydrogen peroxide, but glucose exposure enhances that resistance. The purpose of his statement is to get people who don't want to change their diet to follow his program.

Farnesol, a cell-signaling molecule in Candida albicans promotes hydrogen peroxide resistance - http://ec.asm.org/content/9/4/569.short


Hydrogen peroxide ineffective against Candida albicans - http://jmm.sgmjournals.org/content/53/10/1013.full


Quote:
"But once your problem becomes systemic, all the probiotics on the face of the earth will not take your problem away because the probiotics cannot get to the location where the yeast is growing."

This reveals little understanding of the systemic effect of probiotics on the immune system. In fact, studies demonstrate the beneficial effect against candida albicans in tissues remote to the intestinal tract - vaginal flora, etc.

Another protein regulator in Candida albicans against peroxide - http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027979