"Generates frequencies within the human body that promote rapid healing of disease and injury."

That is what would have got them in to trouble. They made a direct claim of preventing disease. The FDA only allows this for pharmaceutical drugs even if they don't work. Look at the sleeping pills such as Ambien and Lunesta that can make claims of helping people to sleep even though the drug companies admit themselves that there drugs do not promote sleep.

 Yes, I saw that a while ago and it had me worried. I didn't know ozone wasn't dangerous, and that it was even good for us, until Hv got here and explained it.

News like that is what scares people into thinking ozone is bad and we're all nuts. Most people still think the FDA is protecting them and it will take a complete 180 shift in thinking by the majority of people before life gets better here on earth. And how many hundreds of years will that take?

Until then we'll have to get used to being the kooks on the fringe.

 "The seized devices are potentially harmful to public health," said the agency's acting associate commissioner for regulatory affairs, Michael Chappell. "The agency will take action to protect the public from FDA-regulated products that are in violation of the law."

This is a great example of my last post and how the FDA is in bed with the pharmaceutical companies protecting them. Ozone units are not illegal. The law clearly states that ANY therapy in use prior to the induction of the FDA (1909) that shows no unreasonable risk to human safety has a grandfathered approval status. Since ozone therapy predates (1892, and in the US in 1898) the FDA  and has a proven safety record being much safer than ANY FDA approved drug, ozone therapy has a grandfathered approval status. But again the FDA uses illegal tactics including coercion to keep ozone from being used. It is the FDA officials, not the ozone manufacturers that should be going to jail.

Ozone is classified as a respiratory pollutant, and due to its biocidal properties is also used as a disinfectant. 

Hmm... The FDA better ban sunlight and lightening since they expose us to ozone on a daily basis.

The FDA claims that there is no evidence that ozone can be effective as a medical treatment

Just because the FDA refuses to look for the evidence this does not mean it does not exist. If you eat some bacterially contaminated food do you still get sick even though you did not know the bacteria was there? Of course. There is overwhelming evidence that ozone works for a variety of things including cancer and AIDS. But the FDA does not want to look for it so they continue to claim it is illegal. After all the law also allows for the approval of any therapy based on foreign studies. Many countries use ozone therapy as a "mainstream" therapy because the research proving it works exist. By the way all of these countries are also ranked higher than the US in health care.  And how does the FDA plan for evidence in the US to be gathered when they will not even allow the studies? After the AIDS-ozone study at the San Francisco Veterans Hospital, which IS NOT under FDA jurisdiction, found a 100% remission rate of AIDS in all 5 patients tested a larger study was set up at another hospital. The FDA halted the study before it could even begin stating again no evidence of effectiveness. Well, no FDA approved drug had proof of effectiveness prior to being tested. So why didn't the FDA halt the testing of all these unproven drugs since they has no evidence of effectiveness? Just more proof of the FDA's illegal activities and their protection of the drug companies who pay the FDA off and give FDA officials gifts and high levels jobs in exchange for their protection. This was reported to Congress by former commissioner for the FDA Herbert Ley. Apparently Congress was also paid off since they failed to take action over the illegal activities. As further evidence there was the generic drug scandal in which the FDA was caught approving untested drugs in exchange for payoffs. Again, no FDA official was charged for this or for the subsequent illegal activity of harassing the whistle blower (Violation of the Whistle Blower Protection Act).

and expressed concern that patients undergoing ozone therapy might stop using more proven treatments.

What proven treatments? Chemotherapy, which has an average 2-3% success rate for most cancers and is itself a carcinogen (cancer causing agent)?

The agency also expressed concern over "infection from potential contamination of the applicator or catheter."

But wait, they said that ozone is an antiseptic. And the catheters are not breaking any membranes to allow pathogens to enter the bloodstream.  So their claim is nothing more than a scare tactic. Maybe they should start doing something about all the deadly pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices on the market instead of approving them!!!!