According to this it is legit. This is from August/September, so a NoBama judge might have shot it down. I'm not sure.
Must be legit, or NoBama would put the issue to rest by showing all his documents that he's spent a million dollars trying to keep secret.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04Dkfmypcjw
Why doesn't it name the father's residence? Suspicious
Did you see a space asking for residence?
In Kenya, the date is alway with the day first, the month second and then the year.
7 August 1961 - not Aug. 7, 1961.
Do you have proof of that ? Proof that every person in Mombasi Kenya dates exactly as you say?
Is it posssible that the doctor, and others were schooled in different countries where they learned to use the date as they wrote it?
One entry does say 4th day of August, 1961, indicating that multiple persons were involved in the making of the document.
You will find something else to bitch about, so I will wait.
You are so gullible when it comes to anything that bashes Obama. This "document" was originally offered on Ebay. A sales pitch that you and yours took hook, line and sinker.
Not so fast, Twiki.
http://curezone.com/upload/Video/lucas_1.jpg
http://curezone.com/upload/Video/lucas_2.jpg
http://americangrandjury.org/lucas-smith-affidavit-now-filed-with-the-us-dist...
The document does appear to be a forgery, but let me ask you:
When someone comes from a corrupt political machine, refuses to release their original birth certificate and goes to great lengths to hide it an numerous other past records and then proceeds to reneg on their campaign promises (such as no lobbyists for example), don't they leave themselves open to bashing regardless of party affiliation or any other considerations?
DQ
I did not say it was an obvious forgery, just that it likely was - and I note that the internet contains images of an original Australian Certificate that was supposedly used as the template for the Obama one. It even has the same registration number and marks.
See: http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/04/australia_certificate/index...
But one never knows with absolute certainty - forgery can work both ways and only one side of this argument has the power to alter official records and compel coverups.
Now regarding Obama. all the man has to do to silence the debate is:
RELEASE HIS ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
I have yet to see anyone provide any valid reason for him not doing so, instead of only supplying substitute certificates that say an original is on file. Neither have I seen any valid reasons for all the extraordinary measures and expenses he has used to prevent access to all of his other records. I can only conclude that something is being hidden. I also have not seen anyone explain why his own grandmother and other relatives and Kenyans have said that he was born in Kenya. According to Obama's Kenyan (paternal) grandmother, as well as his half-brother and half-sister, Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, not in Hawaii as the Democratic candidate for president claims. His grandmother bragged that her grandson is about to be President of the United States and is so proud because she was present DURING HIS BIRTH IN KENYA, in the delivery room.
Do you care to take a shot at explaining that without making excuses and rationalizations? No one else has.
DQ
Tiki -
It is required in the Constitution of the United States that a president must be a natural born citizen. Quite simply, it is the law of the land. If Obama is not a natural born citizen, then besides the fact that it makes his election a sham and he has no right to be in office, there is this: every action he has taken and every action he takes in the future is invalid because it was not taken by a constitutionally qualified president. That is a very big deal indeed.
That is also the issue that no one has been able to explain away. Why has he simply not produced a copy of his original birth certificate which has been vouched to be on file in Hawaii? Why did he instead get the governor of Hawaii to seal the birth certificate using a Hawaiian law that was designed to prevent identity theft?
Now, I invited you to take a shot at explaining that without excuses or rationalizations. If that was your response ("what is the big deal?"), then you have failed miserably - the same as have all the Obama apoligists who tried to squirm their way around that question. It is a question for which there really is no wiggle room.
DQ
No, you have failed as have all before you. I assure you that you nor anyone else here has ever seen a copy of Obama's Original Birth Certificate online or anywhere else because it has never been produced. What you have seen is a certificate of birth generated decades later with partial information which merely states that there is an full original birth certificate on file, but we have still never seen that original certificate.
Now, you can "think" whatever you want, but the only absolute proof that Obama was born in Hawaii would be an original unadulterated birth certificate. I ask you one more time:
Why has it not been produced?
I understand your resorting to what you "think" and wondering what the big deal is, because there simply are no legitimate reasons to use to answer that question. You don't hide something that would be beneficial to you and put doubts to rest. You know full well why someone hides something - because the truth would be damaging!
DQ