The controllers of this planet use one major theme to bring about their agenda...divide and conquor.

Date:   3/25/2006 2:54:07 AM ( 18 y ago)

The CIA Myths


& the Reality

by Fintan Dunne, Editor, BreakForNews.com


20th December, 2005



URLs:
BreakForNews.com/TheCIAInternetFakes-Part3.htm

This is a compilation from the research, writing
and

audio on BreakForNews
over the last year. It brings

together the key themes we have explored as we


developed the case on the CIA Internet Fakes.



It's trimmed to the minimum so that those not familiar

with our analysis have a comprehensive overview that

shows a flavor of what has really been going on.

--Fintan Dunne




THIS IS A DRAFT VERSION. EXPECT A TIGHTER
EDIT OVER THE NEXT FEW DAYS.





A:
THE CIA MYTHS




An alternative media
article about 9/11 from The San Francisco Bay Guardian, which went beyond
the usual knee-jerk 'conspiracy nuts' angle, noted that:

"As the public reached its pinnacle of being open
to considering alternative views of 9/11, the truth movement fractured
into disparate subgroups, each pushing its own pet theories, torn by
internal divisions over strategy, and unable to mount a cohesive strategy
that would break through the din of election-year politics.

This fracturing was, of course
delberately engineered by the disinfo agents in the 9/11 movement. Indeed,
the 'splits' were a carefully planned and integral part of the coverup
from the start. The establishment has been actively 'managing' the 9/11
skeptics all the while -with a focussed plan which relied opon the guaranteed
reelection of G.W. Bush.



A 9/11 movement was inevitable. When it arose, the establishment was there
in advance, waiting for it with open arms. Many genuine people play key
roles in the 9/11 movement, but are outnumbered by the operatives. 'Management'
of the aftermath was always integral to the plot, and was likely resourced
more heavily than the attack scenario itself.





Another part of the gameplan was to start
with a reasonably sensible 9/11 movement. But they don't want a functioning
9/11 movement around forever.



The longer-term idea was to have the whole host of investigators and activist
leaders take each other out, and thus run the movement into the ground.



If you remember back, Ruppert was to first to bite the dust, in a controversy
over his promotion of the Peak Oil issue (a pro-nuclear power psyop].
Now, that was no accident. Ruppert was/is disposable. You see, they all
are.




The next pre-planned outing was John Gray of 911Truth.org -whom Daniel
Hopsicker linked to funding by arms dealer, Adnan Kashoggi. Once again
-no accident. Build up 'heroes' of the 9/11 issue. Then later expose their
deliberate flaws to cause their supporters to loose heart.



About a year ahead of the Kerry presidential bid 'defeat', they began
a slow escalation of the process of undermining their collective credibility.



Also note when the official 9/11 report was released. This was timed so
that activists would be busy with opposition to the Iraq War and the forthcoming
Kerry presidential bid. But, the big
idea was that the 'defeat' of Kerry would be the final blow to
9/11 activists already reeling from seeing their heroes' feet of clay
--as exposed by all the 9/11 flame wars.




Furthermore, as soon as Kerry was 'defeated', left-wing activists were
soon chasing their tails about the stolen election. So, by the time that
was all over, the 9/11 issue was firmly on the back-burner.





SELF-DESTRUCTING FAKES



Remember back in the summer of 2004. Everybody Knew Bush was going down.
Despite the official polls, true sentiment in the U.S. was running 60:40
against the president. Actual votes on the day were likely to run around
Kerry 55/Bush 45.




Nobody expected Karl Rove to take this lying down, so when pundits predicted
he was about to stage the 'capture' of Osama, or was plotting a fake terrorism
attack to boost Bush, it seemed credible.



This perception was reinforced by the like of Wayne Madsen's confidential
'sources', who in the closing stages of the election campaign reported
that the terror strike was imminent.



It never happened. The elite didn't ensure Bush's reelection by means
of a fake terror strike.




They stole the election instead. As they had always planned to do. While
carefully misdirecting us to look elsewhere during the run up. Now that's
good quality disinformation. Notice the emotional surface appeal of the
terror attack spin. Always the appeal to the emotions -to get reason looking
the other way.



And
when we finally realized that ballots -not bullets- were the KO punch,
leading election fraud activist Bev Harris of BlackBoxVoting.org staged
her own spectacular self-destruction on Air America's Randi Rhodes show.
Just to make sure your votefraud outrage was axed by one of it's 'leaders'.




Just to make sure you could blame Bev when nothing happened about the
stolen election. Another convenient scapegoat -just like Kerry. All of
which disillusioning of opposition comes copyright COINTELPRO, 2004 via
Air America, MSNBC and the Green Party's David Cobb Democracy Memorial
Fund.




But, hey! Bev looked good for a while there. As did MSNBC Countdown's
Keith Olberman -stolen election hero of the left- while he helped box
a national controversy into 20 minute slots on liberal cable. Yeah that
was a breakthrough, wasn't it? NOT.





TABLOID FAKES



The next phase of the plan was for those who started out making some sense
on the 9/11 issue to get more and more shoddy; more hysterical in tone;
and slowly turn into virtual carricatures of 'conspiracy nuts'.

Satanic
rituals( Alex Jones), Homosexuality and child prostitution have already
emerged as key themes(Jeff Gannon). All this happens slowly. But the whole
effect is rather seedy. It's meant to be.



Who can forget GannonGate: a mutedly salacious gay version of MonicaGate.
The sex scandal rocked the Blogsphere -conveniently giving investigative
blogs a discrediting tabloid sheen in the process.



The GannonGate team accelerated a planned downmarket shift into the cosy,
elite-funded internet conspiracy market. Where GannonGate had to compete
with Peak Oil, imminent asteroid impacts, earthchanges, alien abductions,
and other fantasies designed to give 'conspiracy theory' a bad name.




The wild spin was that Gannon is actually Johnny Gosh -kidnapped as a
child and used as a plaything of Washington politicians. An affidavit
in a lawsuit was used as part of 'evidence' that a "vast network of children
[was] trained to work for the government and participate in deviant sexual
acts to make the blackmail of politicians possible." It's National Enquirer
material.



The same applies to the story of Clint Curtis and Florida Republican Tom
Feeney. Wayne Madsen's active here again -moving from predicting the 'terror
strike' that never happened, to helping to launch this account of a computer
vote-stealing plot in Florida. Bradblog is a key vehicle for the Feeney
tale, and a tame mainstream hack has recently been wheeled in to try kickstart
some interest in the story.



None of these internet sensations will ever discomfort the mainstream.
They, and a plethora of similar spins are intended to waste your time
and divert your energy as surely as the Osama no-show terror attack.




A fake alternative media unable to champion the real issues, is in continual
desperate need of half-plausible-sounding drivel to fill the pages and
try divert from real alternative news.



The Orwellian news managers have the market beautifully segmented by see-no-evil
Chinese walls, which allow the manufacture of crude opinion zones: Fox
News fanaticism; gun-totin' Patriots; Mainstream myopia; Soros-funded
MoveOn; Deaniac Dems; the Green Gremlins; CounterPunching Lefties; 9/11
Truthers; God-dammed Communists; and End of the Worlders.



The information war boys have a gambit for each of those markets. And
they have a wide range of specialist media fronts, well placed to roll
out these ploys. It must cost a bundle, but hey, your taxes pay for it
all anyway.



That's the difference between BreakForNews.com
and this host of 'alternative' websites and radio feeds carrying a diet
of information, rich in subtle (and not subtle enough) disinformation.
We don't have their kind of reach or that level of unlimited budget for
unprincipled %¤#&!§-.




Yeah, Jeff Gannon was leading to the inevitable downfall of Karl Rove.
Just like that terror attack in October '04 which got Bush releected.






FAKES TO CONFUSE



In one fell swoop Sibel Edmonds offloaded blame from the CIA --and spread
it across the FBI, the State Department; an unnamed (i.e. Mossad) foreign
intelligence operation; and a non-terrorist criminal network.




Quite a feat.



Soon, from miles away in Florida, Daniel Hopsicker, with help from Atta's
girlfriend Amanda Keller was insisting that Edmonds' story dovetailed
with his discoveries of a drug network linked to 9/11. His list of Florida-based
villians is as exhaustive as that of the dynamic duo in D.C..



One big corner of that overall 9/11 picture is formed by four disparate-seeming
individuals: a veteran whistleblower, an attractive novice whistleblower,
a campaigning journalist and a reputed lingerie model; jigsaw peices called
Ellsberg, Edmonds, Hopsicker and Keller. Ellsberg supports Edmonds, confirmed
by Hopsicker --backed by eyewitness accounts from Keller. But they're
all telling different flavors of the same story.




To specify which story that is, let's take a look at the popular tales
of 9/11. The notorious main division is between LIHOP and MIHOP. But it's
much more detailed than that. Explanations come in a full range of flavors
--starting with the official story:



A. Official story:

CIA/FBI were incompetent;
Bush and/or Clinton were complacent.

B. Official Lame
Conspiracy:

CIA/FBI were incompetent;
Bush/Cheney maybe let it happen; Israelis Knew.

C. Official LIHOP
Conspiracy:

CIA/FBI were compromised;
Bush/Cheney did let it happen; Israelis Helped.

D. Official LIHOP
Wild Conspiracy:

CIA/FBI compromised; Bush/Cheney/Neocons
let it happen; Israelis Did It.

E. Official LIHOP
Tinfoil Conspiracy:

Israelis/Neocons/Bush/Cheney
Did It; CIA/FBI looked the other way.

F. Official MIHOP
'Serious' Conspiracy:

Israelis/Neocons/CIA/FBI/Bush/Cheney/Military-Industrial-Complex
Did It.

G. Official Loony
Conspiracies:

Rothschilds and/or Rockefellers
and/or CFR and/or Bildebergers did it.

Jews and Jewish bankers -who already run everything- did it.

Satanists, Opus Dei or Reptilians did it.

It's a terrific variety of theories.

It plays out something like this:

• The mainstream media push version A; hint at B; sneer at G.


• The controlled right/intellectual media pushes version B.


• The controlled left/intellectual media pushes version C.



• The 'moderate' Fake internet sites push versions C and D.


• The 'softcore' Fake internet sites push versions D and E.


• The 'independent' Fake internet sites push version F.


• The 'loony' Fake interent sites push variations of version G.

But every single one, from A to G are OFFICIAL versions, sanctioned and
promoted by the 9/11 intelligence coverup operation and their CIA Fakes
network. They have a flavor for every market.




The creation of this multiplicity of explanations is a core element of
the coverup. Left to their own devices, people on the Internet might have
figured out the truth themselves. But with this circus in action, there
is always plenty of distraction and lots of division in opinion.



The intelligence coverup is not trying to stop 9/11 conspiracy theories
on the internet. It's creating them. Then playing off supporters
of the different theories against each other. That's a classic Cointelpro-style
tactic.



The perpetrators knew that a sizeable segment of people were going to
be pretty sure 9/11 was not as it seems. They don't mind that, for now.
The immediate objectives are first, to to stop these skeptical views from
gaining hold in mainstream opinion. Second, to prevent a coherent view
forming which could convince a much broader number of people -particularly
those on the political left.




Antiwar.com columnist Justin Raimondo, is as
ever pushing the "Israelis Knew/Did It" angle on 9/11. Many other
CIA Fakes are heavily promoting this line, because it's a key part of
what the coverup hopes will forever be the main vaguely-hinted, but unproven
conspiracy theory on 9/11: Bush, Cheney, and Mossad let it happen on purpose.





FAKES AS DECOYS




Atta,
Atta, Atta, Atta, Atta.



Each new "question" raised about
Atta is designed to relentlessly focus on the official patsy. But you're
supposed to think these are "breakthroughs" by the CIA Fake conspiracy
sites.



The 9/11 perpetrators carefully designed this wild back-story for Atta
in every detail, but you are not supposed to figure that out. It's all
thousands of miles from the major crime scene at the WTC, but then this
is hamburger-style conspiracy marketing. Grab an Atta McWhopper.




Many of the Fakes are running the
Able Danger story about a secret intelligence unit which had identified
Atta either in 2000, or in late 1999 -while Clinton was still running
things. The spin is that this shows how fraudulent is the Bush administration
official line on Atta. As usual, it sounds promising on first sight. It's
Bush's fault.



But, puzzlingly, Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax and other right-wing media are
running the same story. But their take is that the Clinton Justice Department
leaned on the DIA to squelch the report. So it's Clinton's fault.



More spin alleges that the CIA knew but never told the 9/11 Commission,
and that a culture of "obstructionism" still prevails in the agency. So
it's the CIA's fault.




Also doing the rounds, is the account of a "suspicious" visit by Atta
to a gambling ship owned by Republican money-man, Jack Abramoff. All that
is
being loosely connected to Al-Qaida drug dealing and money laundering.
So it's the Saudi's fault.



And all the while, as Sibel Edmonds implies, it's the FBI's fault and
the Israeli's fault.



Amazing, isn't it, that one story can be spun so many different directions.




Everything "discovered" about Mohammed Atta was planned. Atta-Boy's job
was to smear a false trail of associations all over the Florida landscape.



But when it comes down to it, it's all LIHOP. Bush/Cheney had the motive
and let it happen on purpose. Throw in Al-Qaida, some drugs, a few Republicans
and Saudis . Now you have means and opportunity. The LIHOP is complete.
So, let's drop the BS.



The
CIA-backed "conspiracy theory" features scapegoats
GWB and Cheney, whose LIHOP sins will remain forever unproven, but deeply
suspected.




Their official conspiracy theory diversion
patsy is as pervasive as Mickey Mouse: the over-the-top, tabloid
Atta.



The hazy connections supposedly run to the drugs trade, Jeb Bush, the
Saudis and of course the Zionist Mossad [who are reputedly cunning in
the extreme, but somehow also so dumb that they leave a wide trail of
incompetent operatives arrested nationwide in suspicious circumstances].



In other words, the government-sponsored 9/11 conspiracy theory is a masterpiece
of loose innuendo designed to appeal to many target markets. From MadCowProd
to Newsmax to Time magazine.




Same story, same actors, different spins. Cute.





FAKES TO DISCREDIT



All this keeps everybody real busy. Always a new "breakthrough" on the
CIA Fake sites.

Like when radio host,
Alex Jones ran overblown claims linking Peter Power, a crisis management
consultant and former member of Britain's anti-terror police, to a 'terrorism
drill' which Jones alleges was used to provide cover for State perpetrators
of the multiple London bombs.



The weekend article
by Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones was published on the PrisonPlanet.com
website.




They
claimed that in a BBC Radio 5 interview on July 7th, Peter Power admitted
that his Visor Consulting firm: "was
running a 1,000 person strong exercise
which drilled the London Underground being bombed at the exact same locations,
at the exact same times, as happened in real life."



The article went on to claim that the Visor Consulting drill: "acts
as a cover for the small compartamentalized government terrorists
to carry out their operation without the larger security services becoming
aware of what they're doing, and, more importantly, if they get caught
during the attack or after with any incriminating evidence they can just
claim that they were just taking part in the exercise."




In fact, Power's consultancy firm
was running a small "corporate wargame" drill for the management team
of a British company which had 1,000
employees. [mp3
Audio] The figure of 1,000 refers to the size
of the company whose managers were being drilled - and not
to the number of participants in the drill.




The London corporate drill was just a glorified administration seminar
where managers get to use security buzzwords --while seated around an
office table guessing how they would respond to loss of available staff
for call centers, power outages, or travel restrictions, etc..



The hype, was subsequently used to laugh off critics of the official line
on both the 9/11 attacks and the London bombings. The article turned all
skeptics into tinfoil hat fodder. The whole thing was deliberate decoy
designed to allow mainstream media to later ridicule 'conspiracy theories'
which turn out to be untrue.



U.K.
TV Channel 4
is used the Alex Jones' article to sneer at bloggers and alternative media.
News reporter JJ King wrote:

Prison
Planet, in an article entitled 'London Underground Bombing "Exercises"
argued that the simulated attacks were, whether Power knew it or not,
intended to act as a cover for the real ones. News agency Al Jazeera
agreed, baldly asserting that 'The London Underground exercises were
used as the fallback cover to carry out the attack.'

In
fact, the 'exercises' he spoke of on Five Live were carried out purely
'on paper', or at least PowerPoint, by a small group of seven or eight
executives..." As Fintan Dunne, editor of BreakForNews.com points
out, 'these types of private-sector "risk management" drills never
use field staff.

What was galling was that the London bombs black op was full of holes,
but that information sort of got lost as the sensational claims fall flat.
[more]






FAKES AS DIVERSIONS



Not only can the CIA Fakes be used to decoy away from such operations,
they are also useful to create complete diversions, which contain misleading
spin.



Like when Seymour Hersh "uncovered" information about Bush plans to attack
Iran.




Back
in January, 2005 Hersh kicked off with his article 'The
Coming Wars'. Then Scott Ritter fanned the flames in April
with his
prediction on disinfo site AlJazeera.com that by June, 2005
the U.S. was set to invade Iran. On Counterpunch.org, Gary Leupp told
us that "Reports about the recent flurry of Iran-Iraq diplomacy
must shock the neocons."



A reality check would have revealed that the U.S. was logistically, militarily
and politically sinking in the mire in Iraq -thus in no position to take
on any new adventures. It was laughable then, to see the Seymour Hersh
'exclusive' marketed to public opinion in the U.S. -like it was a real
discovery of secret Bush plans. It was downright side-splitting to see
a raft of gullible/useful left-wing commentators promoting this lie.




Could Hersh really be so dumb as to fail to see he was being used? Was
eyeryone else just as credulous? Or is it just that the CIA hacks outnumber
semi-journalists by enough to guarantee these disinformation campaigns
will always work?



Why
do you think that there is no trouble in the Tehran-dominated Shia south
of Iraq? Why do you think the U.S. invaded Iraq in the first place? Because
they knew there would be no
problem in the south. That's why the British got the easy job of occupying
the region --while the GI's were sent north to demolish the Sunni, who
were the real
target of the invasion.

...This
fear has to be finely calibrated. The people being intimidated need
to know enough to be afraid but not so much that they demand justice.
This helps explain why the Defense Department will release certain kinds
of seemingly incriminating information about Guantánamo--pictures of
men in cages, for instance--at the same time that it acts to suppress
photographs on a par with what escaped from Abu Ghraib. "




This strategic leaking of information, combined with official denials,
induces a state of mind that Argentines describe as "knowing/not knowing,"
a vestige of their "dirty war."

A
fine example is the deliberately created plethora of glaring
anomalies in the video depcting the beheading of Nick Berg. Viewed
on face value (not knowing), the video looks like a ruthless and savage
act by Iraqi 'terrorists'.



But Berg was shown in video wearing orange jumpsuit identical to the jumpsuits
used at Guantanamo. The chair that Berg was seated in during the filming
was the exact same kind as seen in a color photo taken at the Abu Ghraib
Prison. The walls and baseboard seen were the same color as in Abu Ghraid
prison.




Thus mainstream 'not knowing', was counterpointed by the internet 'knowing'
the murder of Berg was an inside job. Among the 'not knowing' the Berg
video served to smear Iraqis as 'animals'. Among the 'knowing' it was
meant intimidate antiwar resistance.



Both groups were manipulated by video images which were traumatic to view.
It's called trauma programming. From Guantanamo to Berg has been one massive
PsyOp to ensure you get the message that resistance is useless and downright
dangerous.



And
the same type of tactics have been used to intimidate those who see through
the pretence of arab hijackers being responsible for 9/11. The September
11 attacks were coincident with the release of the CD 'Party Music' by
the group 'Coup'. It was a classic

of PsyOps technique -which triggered the destabilizing flip/flop between
knowing and not knowing that a coup had just taken place in the USA.




What is eerie is that other than Naomi Klien, nobody in the mainstream
is writing about the widespread use of these Psywar tactics in news content
aimed at Western civillian populations. Are the media -mainstream and
alleged alternative- really that
dumb?





HERDING THE SHEEP



Live8. There hadn't been anything
like it since... well since the last Pharma-inspired major world PsyOp:
the so-called SARS epidemic which 'raged' at exactly the time the U.S.
wanted to turn eyes away from Iraq -and yet maintain the elevated sense
of threat which the Iraq invasion had created. Pharma's interests and
those of the G8 New World Order are as one, needless to say.




Populations
who perceive themselves as under threat are more right-wing in their political
and social expression. Which is why these PsyOps are ruthlessly deployed
to set the tone of public attitude -with a lot of help from Big Media.



The whole global campaign on debt relief was political-psychological operation
from the start. A trap. The technique works like this:



Just as in military matters, you never fight an enemy on ground that doesn't
suit you. You manouver your enemy into a landscape as disadvantageous
as possible. Then you meet and defeat. Similarly, in Machiavellian political
manouvering, you don't wait for an issue to get to the point where it
is a problem. Well before it gets to that point, you meet the issue head
on --but on grounds of your choosing.




The issues of natural justice and global equity are and impediment for
an imperial G8 determined on colonial-style exploitation. So, what better
way to meet the issue than by cynically raising hopes in advance, in the
sure knowledge these hopes will be dashed, by a bombing which will also
reinforce the G8-backed War on Terror?




A double-whammy of psychological
warfare which serves the short term war support issue and the long term
global equity issue. If that thought is too much for you, stop reading
long articles like this and go back to comics.



The London bombing attacks conform to a pattern of civilian-directed psychological
operations, of which the Bali and Madrid bombings were a precedent. The
bombings came just a day after London was selected to host the 2012 Olympic
games, and after the world focus on London as part of the Live 8 concert
events. Were the attack to have taken place just 24hrs. before -it would
have scuppered London's bid for the games.




Leaders
of the G8 immediately lined up somberly behind British prime minister,
Tony Blair as he vowed to win against the "terrorists." U.S. President,
George W. Bush later declared that "the
war on terrorism goes on."



The resulting public relations image portrayed by the western corporate
media, effectively presenting the G8 as a de facto world government, rising
to power on the basis of their self-portrayal as defenders of our freedoms.



And, sidelined by the London bombs, the debt-relief campaigners were effectively
dismissed.




We are witnessing a series of choreographed psychological-military operations
inspired by core elements of the G8, which are designed to stampede people
into casting aside hard won civil liberties, while moving to a global
governmental/military/economic order based on the values of power and
money -not social development, equity and justice.



Can we see signs of the same cynical technique of the calculated smashing
of the hopes of ordinary people being applied elsewhere? Unfortunately,
we can.





THEM BONES




After
the presidential 'election' of 2004, John Kerry should have taken a chopper
to some aircraft carrier and pose in front of one of those "Mission Acomplished"
banners.



John Kerry's lasting legacy in American politics will be as the willing
enabler of the destruction of Fallujah (a city 300,000 had called home)
and the slaughter of around 6,000 mostly civillian inhabitants. Kerry's
slick Hari-Kari created the opening. The U.S. military drove through the
gap, while a numbed and PsyOp'ed U.S. (and world) population flailed around
trying to understand what had just happened.



Protests took place across the world marking the second anniversary of
the invasion of Iraq. New York activist Michael Letwin told
the BBC: "I think Bush's re-election took the steam out of the anti-war
movement".




Which is precisely what Kerry's pied piper,
alternative candidacy pretence was intended to achieve. The Kerry presidential
bid co-opted anti-war sentiment; diverted resistance from anti-war protest
to pro-Kerry canvassing; and then disenchanted the opposition to the war
when their 'hero" fell without substantially challenging the "stolen election."



In truth, the establishment runs all major political movements in the
USA. From the Republicans to Nader. From the Democrats and Greens to the
gun-totin' patriots. It's the best democracy money can buy, USA-style.






POLITICAL FOOTBALLING



A key objective of the elite agenda was, and is to use resistance to Bush
as a recruiting seargeant for a "grassroots" relaunch of the Democratic
Party. That's why we have had the Move-On phenomenon and the lavish funding
of the 'soft' left by a Bush opponent(don't make me laugh!) like George
Soros.



Think of it as an outreach program akin to that used to engineer the ascension
of Yushchenko in the Ukraine. The process continues with the elevation
of Howard Dean to chair the DNC-in a rebound from his pre-arranged exit
from the presidential campaign. Dean and the Dems are still selling hard,
buy buying interest is low.



"Shock and Awe" is the U.S. military's term for the psychologically-oriented
mass bombing of Iraq. "Shock and Awe" is also the modus operandi in political
assassinations (JFK, Diana, Sgrena) and in political suicide, Kerry-style.





The 'defeat' of Kerry in the stolen U.S. presidential election --which
in advance had raised such high hopes on the left in the U.S.-- shattered
the left psychologically and nipped the U.S. anti-war movement in the
bud.



The establishment knew in advance that Kerry would loose. Partly by arrangement
with Mr. Kerry, and partly by means of being able to tweak the electronic
voting system in the U.S. to ensure a Bush victory. Therefore they knew
they would send packing a horde of left-wing voters symbolically led by
John Kerry, the pied piper of the losing team.



But that still left them a problem. The hard-core left activists would
not slump off as readily. And they knew about covert control of the electronic
voting systems. So they would immediately start making noise about all
that and might spoil the illusion of democracy. So, what to do?




The answer was tactically brilliant. Why not dupe the left again
--using the same tatic and the same person? If the broad mass of voters
could be suc***ed into backing Kerry --only to be stunned by the betrayal,
then why not pull the same stunt immediately afterwards on the hard-core
activists who remain.



Seed their doubts using a Zogby poll and some provocateurs. Get the plastic
John Edwards to make an election night promise that "every vote will be
counted." Have the Kerry campaign make ambiguous moves that indicate he
is going to challege the result. But then, after weeks of raised expectations,
have him fail to deliver. You can't really challenge an elction if the
challenger won't challenge, so in the let-down, the issue will fizzle
out.





PSYOPING SINCE 1984




The attitude to Africa which the G8 wanted us to have is that it should
be seen as a failing continent in need of a swift neocolonial power-grab
by the G8 to rescue it from the maw of both AIDS and poverty. [See:
Dawn of the G8
New World Order]



So, here's how this will really pan out: the debt-relief will be used
to copperfasten the dependance of African governments on the G8 and as
a lever to secure ruinous 'fair' trade deals. A lot of any extra aid will
be funneled through Paul Wolfowitz's World Bank.



The Pharma people will pocket much of the rest -as profit from discounted
sales of failing toxic AIDS drugs. All of this ushered in as a 'feel good'
phenomenon by wealthy revolutionaries, against the unworrying background
of the banal lyrics of mass-market pop-pap music.




But what makes this global African Colonization PsyOp so ironic for Africa
is that the whole AIDS paradigm on which it is based has
itself also been a PsyOp from the start.



The AIDS hysteria was launched in (appropriately) 1984 under Ronald Regan's
presidency. HIV was the Osama Bin Laden of 1984. The evidence that the
virus was the real cause of the disease was about as flimsy and/or nonexistant
as that linking Osama to 9/11. And we are still waiting for that evidence
in both cases.



Both 9/11 and AIDS have fulfilled the fear, terror and social hysteria
agenda of the G8 NWO. Their astounding success with AIDS led directly
to 9/11.




AIDS is a concocted disease syndrome which now lumps together a range
of illness from tuberculosis to cervical cancer to malaria and hypothesizes
that these are new AIDS-versions of the same old diseases. The so-called
'gay-plague' made scapegoats of gays in the U.S. and around the world.
Pharma-funded gay health groups sold the party line to their members with
backing from a hysterical media. It played just like the Iraq WMD hysteria.



The invented 'syndrome' was not just designed to freak out gullible Westerners.
It was designed to nip African independence in the bud. Why bother trying
to overthrow the colonial powers pulling the strings in Africa, if the
continent was doomed anyway by AIDS?



That was the PsyWar message to Africans: embrace despair and disillusion
-not revolution.




It's an information age. What is going on is information warfare.





GAMEPLAN



The U.N. has rubber-stamped an Iraqi puppet government --complete with
a CIA-sponsored Iraqi president --and a U.S. ambassador with a blind spot
about death squads. The ultimate bad-cop: the USA, and the pseudo good-cop:
the UN --are carving up Iraq together, behind a facade.




In Brussels at an international conference on the future of Iraq, U.N.
Secretary-General Kofi Annan, sat down next to U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, to lend the endorsement of the United Nations to the
U.S. in Iraq.



This is the same U.N. which postured against the illegal invasion of Iraq.
This is the same EU which supposedly opposed the same invasion. In the
interim, the occupation forces have ironically and ruthlessly bombed Iraq
with nuclear weapons; flattened Fallujah and slaughtered up to 6,000 of
it's inhabitants with napalm, nerve gas and other weapons of mass destruction.



The U.N. and EU political opposition to the invasion was fake. Merely
a sop to outraged public opinion in countries around the world. The gloves
have been off for quite a while.



And the G8 summit in Georgia announced a 50,000 strong global "peacekeeping"
force --aimed first at Africa. And they simultaneously declared a "partnership"
with a zone called "Broader Middle East and North Africa." U.S. Centcom,
in other words.




Next comes the carve up of Africa, and the rest of the Middle East. Next
comes the continuation of genocidal policies against the world's poor.
Next comes the global corporate order, resource pillage, and a modern
version of old-style colonialism.



In the real world, 9/11 is no rogue Bush/Cheney operation, it is part
of a coherent and calculated gambit by global corporate-sponsored imperialism.



Welcome to the G8 New World Order






Further Reading:

Our
Good Friends in the CIA - NOT !

Mickey
Atta and the Big McWhoppers

Good
Cops, Bad Cops and the Stolen Election

Disinfo:
The Iran Invasion Drivel


The
CIA, The Left & Tabloid 9/11

How
Black Ops Staged the London Bombings

Rise
of The G8 New World Order

Live8
is an NWO Psyop - so is AIDS

PsyOp
America - From 9/11 to Guantanamo to Berg


9/11
: The Aliens Did It !

Gannon
and the Inevitable Downfall of Rove

Time
May Show 9/11 Paranoia is Not All Crazy

What
Have John Kerry and Giuliana Sgrena Got in Common?

Popularity:   message viewed 2355 times
URL:   http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=978185

<< Return to the standard message view