Celebrity Dissent Supressed by Lapis .....

As I and others continue to take the pulse of our political lanscape as it relates to freedom, I continue to find distressing signals. It is clear that dissent is being supressed by the powers that be in corporate/political America as the globalists move toward creating a police state (new world order). This article speaks to a couple celebrities who are being harrassed for speaking out against the policies of the Bu$h regime. There are many, many more celebrities that are being chastized and harrassed for doing the same. I have blogged about this in the past. Another such celebrity that has been speaking out, while being met with resistance, is Harry Belafonte. I will include more on him as more becomes available. Will you stand up and take notice of the new nazi-like machine that is sweeping North America (World)?

Date:   3/1/2006 1:22:56 AM ( 18 y ago)

Celebrity castigations a microcosm of the broader attack on freedom


Steve Watson | February 28 2006



There
has recently been a spate of reports concerning the castigation and
investigation of various celebrities who have voiced a political
opinion that is critical of the government, the "war on terror" or the
war in Iraq.


This is a
dangerous indication that our society as whole is systematically being
deprived of freedom of speech and being coerced into a mindset that
says those who question their government are traitors.


We
undoubtedly live in a celebrity obsessed society and the media drives
this forward to its full advantage. The way the political opinions of
those in the limelight are portrayed in the mainstream media is
communicated to a mass audience and becomes a microcosm for political
opinion in general.


The attempt at utter destruction of the reputation of George Clooney in the press recently reveals this very premise.



Clooney - known as a prominent critic of the Bush government - told the BBC that he had been "nailed" in the American media following his vocal opposition to ongoing conflict in Iraq.


"I've
been nailed in the American press as a traitor to my country because I
said we should ask questions before we went to war," he has commented.


"But
I never held a press conference saying 'this is what you should think'.
I asked questions and said 'these are the questions that I believe I
have the right to ask' - which is what our government was founded on."


Clooney has also famously been branded a "traitor" by the US media for expressing his opinions.


Since
when was anyone a traitor for suggesting we should be keeping the
government in check? Were the founding fathers traitors? Yes they were.
They were traitors to the crown, to the rulers, who wished to continue
their Iron fist reign. The foundation of America was treasonous only to
the power hungry and the ruling elite because a few dared to suggest
that the people should enjoy greater freedoms and equalities and that
THEY should be served by those who are elected to run things.



Clooney's two current movies, Good Night, And Good Luck and Syriana,
are social commentaries that have subtle political overtones relevant
to current events. However, they are in no way extremely
anti-government or radically political.


Despite
this Clooney continues to be portrayed by the media as a dangerous
left-wing critic whose anti-war opinions are not indicative of
Americans, despite the fact that THE MAJORITY now believe the war was a
mistake and want immediate withdrawal.


Clooney has also been targeted for suggesting in Syriana that the government does not listen to the people.


He
has commented that "the three branches of the US government are "all on
the same side" and therefore the idea of Syriana was to be an "opposing
voice... to say, 'at the very least, you have to be allowed to ask
tough questions'."



HOW DARE YOU CRITICISE YOUR COUNTRY!


In another recent "celebrity revelation" it came to light that the singer Morrissey had been detained and questioned by the FBI.


His crime? "Speaking out against the American and British governments."


Morrissey
was quoted as saying that he had been "investigated, interviewed and
taped" in order to determine whether or not he was a threat to either
governments.


"I don't
belong to any political groups, I don't really say anything unless I'm
asked directly and I don't even demonstrate in public...My view is that
neither England or America are democratic societies. You can't really
speak your mind and if you do you're investigated." Morrissey commented.


One
of Morrissey's recent songs was a proudly patriotic composition that
relayed the message that to him being British was not about being
coerced to think in whatever way the state wishes, but to enjoy hard
earned freedom of expression. The lyrics to Irish Blood, English Heart are as follows:



Irish blood, English heart, this I'm made of

There is no-one on earth I'm afraid of

And no regime can buy or sell me


I've been dreaming of a time when

To be English is not to be baneful

To be standing by the flag not feeling


Shameful, racist or partial


Irish blood, English heart, this I'm made of

There is no-one on earth I'm afraid of

And I will die with both my hands untied


I've been dreaming of a time when

The English are sick to death of Labour


And Tories, and spit upon the name of Oliver Cromwell

And denounce this royal line that still salute him

And will salute him forever


Is it now traitorous to hold these views? The FBI and British special branch certainly seem to think so.


Yet another celebrity thought criminal was revealed recently in the form of rock star and stand-up comedian Henry Rollins.


The dastardly deed carried out by renowned hardman Rollins was.... reading a book on an aeroplane.



Rollins was reported to the Australian authorities for reading a book entitled Jihad: The Rise Of Militant Islam In Central Asia.


Rollins
then received a letter from the Australian government warning him not
to read such books in future. His response was to post the letter on
his website and tell the Australian government to "go f***k themselves."


The
government of Australia is actually telling people what they can and
cannot read. And now it seems that if you want to actually learn about
something (like Jihad), in order to attempt to understand the premise,
then you yourself are considered to be sympathetic to that subject.


Let's
put this into context. If a student reads about the rise of the Nazi
party does that make him or her a fascist? If you pick up a book about
a serial killer, does it mean you want to go out and murder scores of
people?


Whilst movies
like Clooney's or songs like Morrissey's are portrayed by the media as
unpatriotic and unrepresentative of our societies, those that tow the
government line are lauded and praised to the hilt.


Several new movies and TV productions have and will continue to uniformly reinforce the official line on the events of 9/11, an line that over half of New Yorkers believe to be lies.



Whilst
actors like Clooney are castigated, others such as arch Neo-Con Bruce
Willis will be given glowing praise as he produces his pro-war Iraq film that relates "the success" of liberating the Iraqi people.


The
state cringes when movies that actually make people think hit the big
screen but they salivate when an audience can be hoodwinked into buying
their crap through the medium of entertainment.


It is no surprise that another movie that has involved Clooney is the upcoming blockbuster A Scanner Darkly
which further highlights a growing movement within Hollywood to push
the genre firmly towards the direction of subtle social commentary that
involves questioning, thinking and warning.


In
the post 9/11 world there has been renewed attempt to make it seem like
these kind of productions and the views behind them are somehow
dangerous or unpatriotic, when exactly the opposite is true.



We
are led to believe by the media that no one really thinks in this way
and they are the strange views of someone who has spent too much time
in the public eye and has become too self important and perhaps a
little paranoid.


In
reality the progressive views of people like Clooney, who have
carefully learned their trade over many years, picked thought provoking
and informative projects to be involved with and not simply been thrust
into the limelight via the latest Hollywood blockbuster, are a
microcosm for society as a whole.


Sadly
the relentless attack on these people is also indicative of the
relentless attack on freedom of expression and intelligent thought on a
wider scale.

 

Popularity:   message viewed 2176 times
URL:   http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=978139

<< Return to the standard message view

Page generated on: 11/23/2024 12:38:57 AM in Dallas, Texas
www.curezone.org