More on my favorite curency. Did I post that I had a job in China, and the yuan could not be brought home and/or converted..so any savings from working would be left behind in the land of the master merchants- the superpower called China

Date:   11/29/2005 10:19:04 AM ( 19 y ago)

U.S. Declines a Chance to Criticize Yuan Policy


By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
Published: November 29, 2005
WASHINGTON, Nov. 28 - Six months ago, the Bush administration warned that it would accuse China of currency manipulation if it failed to make substantial changes to its fixed peg between the yuan and the dollar.


Text: Semiannual Report on International Economic and Exchange Rate Policies In July, China allowed the yuan to rise by 2 percent, the first change in more than 10 years, but it has not budged since.

On Monday, the Treasury Department once again held its tongue. Instead of accusing China of currency manipulation, it expressed disappointment that trading in the yuan is "highly constricted" and said it would "intensely scrutinize" its practices in future reports.

The statement was included in a report issued by the department every six months on the currency policies of the nation's trading partners.

It provoked an angry reaction from American manufacturers, some lawmakers and outside trade analysts who have argued for years that China has deliberately undervalued its currency to make its exports cheaper in world markets.

"We've seen this movie before," said Frank Vargo, senior vice president for international affairs at the National Association of Manufacturers. "What Treasury is saying is pretty much of a rerun of what it said back in May."

In Congress, two leading critics of China quietly renewed threats to seek legislation that would impose steep tariffs on Chinese imports if the yuan was not allowed to float more freely.

"The Chinese manipulate their currency, and the administration should not have ducked the issue," said one, Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York. "Their refusal to acknowledge reality and take the necessary corrective actions hurts every American."

Mr. Schumer and Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, have been co-sponsors of a bill that would impose tariffs of 27.5 percent on Chinese imports. This month, the two lawmakers agreed to defer a vote on their bill but left open the option of demanding a vote as early as December.

China's trade surplus with the United States has continued to balloon in 2005 and is expected to approach a record $200 billion, bigger than the United States trade imbalance with any other nation, including Japan and the entire European Union.

The trade imbalance is all but certain to widen even more next year. China's exports to the United States are six times its imports, meaning that American exports to China would have to climb at six times the rate of imports just to keep the trade balance at current levels.

To keep its currency from rising in value, China's central bank continues to buy up United States debt and has acquired hundreds of billions of dollars in Treasury securities.

"It's a big mistake not to label China if the U.S. law has any meaning," said C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Institute for International Economics, a research group in Washington. "They are still intervening massively to keep their currency from rising. I don't see how you can not define that as manipulation."

Most analysts agree that the yuan is undervalued and would rise if China allowed it to float more freely. That makes Chinese exports cheaper for people paying in dollars, though it is far from clear that a higher value for the yuan would offset China's huge cost advantage in cheap labor.

Treasury Secretary John W. Snow has spent the last two years trying to persuade China that flexible exchange rates are in its own interest.

Branding China a "currency manipulator" would be largely symbolic, but it would be the first time in 11 years that the United States has made such a charge and would represent a much more confrontational approach.

Greater pressure on China could come from Congress. In a vote that stunned the White House as well as Chinese officials, the Senate voted 67 to 33 against squelching a floor vote on the Schumer-Graham bill. That bill would impose tariffs of 27.5 percent if China failed to let its exchange rate reflect market forces.

To postpone an immediate vote last spring, Senate Republican leaders promised Mr. Schumer and Mr. Graham that they would be given a chance to bring their measure up later this year. Mr. Schumer said he had not decided whether to seek a vote as early as December, but an aide said that "everything is on the table."

Administration officials flatly oppose such legislation, saying it would jeopardize trade and hurt consumers. Instead, they once again stressed their desire to let Chinese leaders make good on their repeated vow of moving toward a floating exchange rate.

"We're going to give them the benefit of the doubt that they will do what they say they are going to do," said Timothy D. Adams, under secretary of the Treasury for international affairs. "We would just urge them to undertake a quicker pace of reform."



 

Popularity:   message viewed 1568 times
URL:   http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=976053

<< Return to the standard message view