Semantics at Law

Date:   12/24/2015 6:35:08 AM ( 9 y ago)

"...
Congress, at one time revered, is now the most despised class in America.

This Memorandum documents and presents evidence of their efforts over the last 150+ years to evade and defeat the jurisdictional restrictions of the Constitution, usurp exercise of jurisdiction in extra-constitutional geographic area, and betray, defraud, and subjugate their creator, the American People, by way of perversion of the ordinary and popular meaning of certain key words in the Constitution—'State' and 'United States'—through stealth transmutation of said proper nouns into arcane statutory terms with an unfathomable and constitutionally opposite meaning, reliance on inability of the American People to ascertain the true meaning and legal effect of said terms, and exploitation of their ignorance of the new 'law' to deprive them of life, liberty, and property."[1]

I've previously posted a number of times about the need to define, clarify, clear, etc. terms and most especially when they are used in any agreement. The terms "State" and "United States" are only two of many terms in legal documents with meanings that are other than the meanings typically associated with these words when used in conventional settings. If this makes sense to you then you may like to continue reading the Memorandum of Law[1]

I've read the memorandum up to the following point.:

8. Notwithstanding the clarity of the Supreme Court in Hepburn and New Orleans, supra, “to provide Internal Revenue,” Congress, on June 30, 1864, classify the District of Columbia and the territories as “states” and exclude from that designation the members of the Union as contemplated by the Framers and memorialized in the Constitution; to wit:
SEC. 182.
And be it further enacted, That wherever the word state is used in this act it shall be construed to include the territories and the District of Columbia where such construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this act. “An Act to provide Internal Revenue to support the Government, to pay Interest on the Public Debt, and for other Purposes,” Ch. 173, 13 Stat. 223, 306, June 30, 1864.

***********^***********
Notes:

[1] https://supremecourtcase.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/memorandum-of-law-revised-121315-for-posting-draft-2-1.pdf

***********^***********
Keywords:

Congress, America, jurisdictional restrictions, Constitution, usurpation, federal jurisdiction, extra-constitutional, defraud, subjugate, American People, State, United States, statutory terms, terms, legal effect, law, life, liberty, and property

 

Popularity:   message viewed 1457 times
URL:   http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2293759

<< Return to the standard message view