- Forbidden Knowledge by Ready2Rapture
- Frauds in Science by Ready2Rapture 19 y
- idealism v realism by #27054 19 y
1,138
- Re: idealism v realism by Ready2Rapture 19 y
1,533
You're still being very cryptic as to your point, but I will comment.
I just went to PBS NOVA to hear an audio clip of a theoretical physicist (Nima Arkani-hamed of Harvard University) as he explained the basic concept of the theory. The main thing that struck me was that he stated the theory is founded on two primary ASSUMPTIONS: the constancy of C and physics "looks the same in all frames of reference". Obviously, as I've shown, the constancy of C is being seriously questioned.
So E = mc2 is hardly "realism", as proven by the fact that it comes under the heading of THEORETICAL physics. It's an idea, making it IDEALISM. So I must assume you're saying that the theory is the "idealism" and God is the "reality". Add This Message To Your CureZone Favorites!
|
Reply to This Message:    | |
| | Use of CureZone is subject to the following Terms of Service |
Translate This Page:
|
Manage Email Notifications: Subscribe or Unsubscribe
all messages by Ready2Rapture inside this blog: sorted by: Date Subject all messages by Ready2Rapture across all blogs & forums: sorted by: Date Subject |
 Important Disclaimer!
Answers, comments and opinions provided on CureZone are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. CureZone does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages, comments or articles on CureZone. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. Read more ... |
|
|
|
CureZone
