"... Federal Judge Orders CDC to Produce Secret Documents ... The CDC Has Known All Along How Dangerous Vaccines Are - And Has Covered It Up ... This article is the sixth in a series about THE MOST IMPORTANT COURT CASE ABOUT AUTISM currently being litigated - the Hooker v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al case." Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen - Friday, July 6th, 2012

Date:   7/25/2012 5:42:51 PM ( 12 y ago)

"... EVERY one of the CDC studies showing the so-called safety of mercury in vaccines has been intentionally faked, so as to lead the American Public, and every entity worldwide that relies on the CDC for information, to believe that mercury in vaccines is safe - it is not."[1]

***
May 14, 2018 - My Interview With Former CBS Star Reporter - by Jon Rappoport -

I’m reprinting an excerpt from an interview I did, several years ago, with former CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson.

It’s a reminder about the difference between fake and real news, and about who the major purveyors of fake news are.

It also reveals a familiar strategy major news outlets deploy, when they happen to publish a true story and then realize its explosive implications: they shut down all further investigation. They close the book.

Here is my piece in full:

Unless you’ve been living in a cave, you’re aware that a film, Vaxxed, has been showing in theaters across America and overseas—and audiences are stunned by its revelations.

Vaxxed exposes a huge scandal at the CDC, where a long-time researcher, William Thompson, confessed (2014) that he and colleagues committed gross fraud in a study of the MMR vaccine.

Thompson admitted the evidence showed the vaccine led to a higher risk of autism in children—but that finding was intentionally buried, and the vaccine was given a free pass.

Of course, mainstream reporters have been mercilessly attacking Vaxxed, and a segment of the population finds it impossible to believe that the CDC would ever commit this kind of fraud.

So, as a mind-changer, let me take you back to the late summer of 2009, and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine. Remember?

The problem was, the CDC was concealing another scandal.

At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly stopped counting cases of the illness—while, of course, continuing to warn Americans about its unchecked spread.

Understand that the CDC’s main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.

What was the Agency up to?

Here is an excerpt from my interview with Sharyl Attkisson:

Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

—end of interview excerpt—

It was routine for doctors all over America to send blood samples from patients they’d diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the “most likely” Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.

That was the big secret. That’s what the CDC was hiding. That’s why they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That’s what Attkisson had discovered. That’s why she was shut down.

But it gets even worse.

Because about three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon)[11].

Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

In the summer of 2009, the CDC secretly stops counting Swine Flu cases in America, because the overwhelming percentage of lab tests from likely Swine Flu patients shows no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.

There is no Swine Flu epidemic.

Then, the CDC estimates there are 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US.

So…the premise that the CDC would never lie about important matters like, oh, a vaccine increasing the risk of autism…you can lay that one to rest.

The CDC will lie about anything it wants to. It will boldly go where no person interested in real science will go.

It will completely ignore its mandate to care about human health, and it will get away with it.

And CBS will conveniently forget how it aided and abetted the CDC, by censoring real news, and instead opted for egregious and titanic fake news.[10]
-


***
May 25th -

Just got this and haven't read it yet! I first thought of sending it to my professor friend however then I immediately realized I don't believe that they are really open to actually considering any of this.:

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2016/05/24/cdc-forced-to-release-proof-they-knew-vaccine-preservative-causes-autism/?utm_source=Waking

***
September 4, 2016 -

The stakes appear to be are much higher now! CDC wants legal authority to imprison and forcibly vaccinate. The current proposal has several hundred negative comments. The following is the first one I found that is negative yet relatively emotionally stable:

[The is a Comment on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Proposed Rule: Control of Communicable Diseases Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]

Comment from Ken Walton -

"I have read key parts of this rule. As a retired scientist with over 50 years of experience in basic and clinical biomedical research, I find these rule changes to constitute extreme over-reach with regard to individual liberties and health necessities. The chance of a situation requiring such stringent measures occurring is extremely remote. However, given the lack of understanding of basic health issues and/or the lack of the comprehensive vision necessary to forsee the socially destabilizing outcome of such a rule, the chance of abuse of the rule is great. Abuse of the rule is likely to be more destructive of human life than the absence of such a rule."

Continuing with Comment from Tia Severino

"Really, CDC? In the face of one of your TOP scientists admitting to widespread corruption and fraud, after providing 10,000 documents PROVING such fraud, are you seriously attempting to create such a malicious rule that would allow you to forcibly POISON any individual that you see fit? This is TYRANNY, and WE THE PEOPLE will not stand for it.

Your days are numbered, CDC. The house of cards is falling. Your actions reveal you to be the monster that you really are.
http://www.vaxxedthemovie.com to watch Vaxxed and learn ALL about the FRAUD at the CDC.

http://www.arevaccinessafe.org to learn the TRUTH about vaccine safety, efficacy, and necessity.

NEWS FLASH! Vaccines never saved us from diseases. Sanitation and proper hygiene, plumbing, waste removal, end to child labor, proper nutrition and a better understanding of how disease is spread - those are the REAL reasons for the decline in diseases, which by the way were ALL on the decline before vaccines!

Now we have - because of your fear-mongering - traded relatively benign childhood diseases for life-long debilitation and disability, or death by vaccine.

Read Suzanne Humphries' book "Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History" if you want to know the TRUTH about the history of Vaccines and the fact that they have NEVER been the savior they are touted to be.

- My child was injured by vaccines.
- I was injured by vaccines
Don't tell me I haven't done my research. I most certainly HAVE."

A Comment from Sam Oconnel (on page 7) -

"I do not know where the perceived authority to take any of these actions would come from. They clearly violate God's law, international Law, and the Constitutions that allows for your limited existence in the first place. You are effectively declaring war against the American People by claiming such authority. I suggest thinking about what you seek to do, and ask yourself if you are ready to start the war you seek against those you are charged to protect."

Comment from H F (on page 9).

"To Whom It May Concern:

Neither of the disease outbreaks that have been described in this new rule proposal happened in the United States. The Measles outbreak in California was a minimal outbreak and there were no deaths because Measles is not a deadly disease for the typical person. The CDC does not have a good history of doing what is in the best interest of the American People with regards to allegedly committing fraud in vaccine safety studies and conducting unethical studies as in Tuskegee. I do not trust the CDC to do what is right or appropriate if given the control to quarantine the American People."

This following comment especially got my attention as I have recently started researching the first Nuremberg Trial.

Comment from Anonymous

"You want to violate the Nuremberg Code? Haven't you learned anything from history?" (page 10):

The Nuremberg Code

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006

Now it's time for me to begin drafting my "comment".

I see a number of points that need to be made and I'll do my best to make these points as clear and concise as possible.

1.) We need to know what the people are thinking who originated the CDC proposal. -

A number of individuals posting on this issue have made comments as if they knew what the "thinking" is. Some individuals wondered whether the enacted proposal would incite civil war. It's a thought that deserves consideration by the American people. Would "civil war" be the justification needed for enacting total Martial Law? Others have said all that is needed is for the president to declare a national health emergency supposedly based on the threat of some virus. Yet others commenting have said that the CDC proposal is an (de facto) act of Martial Law!

The speculations and uncertainty over this proposal deserves a investigation. Can the American People demand a full investigation with defined government support that is in total compliance with the Organic Laws? (These instances of governmental overreach are not just a "Constitutional" issue.[4]

In our investigation we first need to know the true Lawful nature of the CDC. By what authority does it operate? If a verifiable Lawful authority exists then what are the Lawful limits of the "proprietary-based jurisdiction" for that authority?[5]

2.) (This point actually precedes the above as it empowers us to question government authority) - we need to Know Who and What we are as Individuals with regards to our Individual "Unalienable Rights" that preexist the so called "Constitution". Remember: "'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

The preceding quote from the Declaration of Independence has been called 'one of the best-known sentences in the English language', containing 'the most potent and consequential words in American history'. The passage came to represent a moral standard to which the United States[3] should strive. This view was notably promoted by Abraham Lincoln, who considered the Declaration to be the foundation of his political philosophy, and argued that the Declaration is a statement of principles through which the United States Constitution should be interpreted.

Do you know what unalienable means?
If not then this term deserves at least a look at the following "mini-course" article:
http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=2301311

Why is the clarity and understanding (that I am pointing to) needed for responding to the issue at hand and / or any other issue that comes "under color of law"? It's needed because we all have been conditioned (from the day we were born) to fit into a homogenized society that is always obedient to whatever external authorities come into our lives no matter how extreme the authoritarian power may get abused. Now is the time to decondition ourselves from this behavior. At a deeper level we have universal fears of survival that are programmed into our DNA that make the conditioning possible. We become immune to conditioning when we release the fear! The more fearless we become the more free we are to question authority and to assert all of our "unalienable Rights" in support of the questioning process and the investigations that are needed now.

***
September 5th, 2016 -

Posted comment at Jon Rapport's blog:

Thank you Jon!

The “… step-by-step long-term op” is now revealed, thanks to you and a couple additional writers!

The facts are plain to see (for individuals with the eyes to see this). I intend to add additional light on the core problem of expansionism under “color of law” so we can cut to the root (rather than hack at the branches). Thanks to your presentation here Jon for I now have the additional insight in reading “an individual traveling interstate”! The “commerce clause”! “… the clause is often paired with the Necessary and Proper Clause, the combination used to take a broad, expansive perspective of these powers.”[i] I’m blogging about this whole subject matter as well.[ii]

Although there are additional writers on this issue here I don’t know many that realize the magnitude of “this version of fascism” and the systemic nature – hence “the matrix”!

[i] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce_Clause
[ii] http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=1967283[6]

Now I understand the "color of law" (in the following) for the expansion of government's intrusion into the lives of virtually all people.

"According to the Articles of Confederation, 'Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated' ... Thus, the Continental Congress had no powers incidental to those which were 'expressly delegated' by the Articles of Confederation.[...] By contrast, the Necessary and Proper Clause expressly confers incidental powers upon Congress, while no other clauses in the Constitution do so by themselves.[...]

The draft Necessary and Proper Clause provoked controversy during discussions of the proposed constitution, and its inclusion became a focal point of criticism for those opposed to the Constitution's ratification. While Anti-Federalists expressed concern that the clause would grant the federal government boundless power, Federalists argued that the clause would only permit execution of power already granted by the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton spoke vigorously for this second interpretation in The Federalist Papers. At this time James Madison concurred with Hamilton, arguing in Federalist No. 44 that without this clause, the constitution would be a 'dead letter'. At the Virginia Ratifying Convention, Patrick Henry took the opposing view, saying that the clause would lead to limitless federal power that would inevitably menace individual liberty.[...]"[7]

***
April 24, 2017 -

I got to watch two episodes of "The Truth About Vaccines". Mike Adams was truly inspiring for me. His contribution to the "truth" here is incalculable! At his naturalnews site he declares: "This is why no one trusts the CDC: they lie as a matter of policy".[8]
-

***
February 20, 2018 - More From Jon Rapport - "Incredible Pandemic Hoax From the Ministry of Truth" -

“WHO (World Health Organization), ... for years defined pandemics as outbreaks causing ‘enormous numbers of deaths and illness,’ but in early May, removed this phrase from the definition.”[9]
-

***********^***********
Notes:

[1]
http://www.bolenreport.com/Mark%20Geier/foiasuit6.htm

Once the public trust in this department has been officially recognized as broken, the remainder of deceit can begin to be revealed.

[2] Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.

[3] The use of the term "United States" deserves correction (that I'm at least making note of here to possibly follow-up on at wikipedia). The Lawful term in this instance is actually "The United States of America". The term "United States" is distinguished from "The United States of America" as it pertains to the property owned by The United States of America. The Articles of Confederation designated the confederation of the thirteen states as "The United States of America":
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp

[4] Now is a good time to get clear about how all four Organic Laws fit together and are required to hold government accountable accordingly. The original Lawful limitations of government's purpose and jurisdiction can only be seen in light of all four Organic Laws.

[5] Jurisdiction is another reason why we the American people need to have both individual and collective clarity regarding the four Organic Laws as together they reveal the proprietary nature of government. Understanding the proprietary nature of government's jurisdiction gives better understanding to the phrase "To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) ... and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, ..."[2] etc.!

[6] https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/09/05/the-cdc-medical-police-state-the-right-to-detain-anyone/#comment-179193

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessary_and_Proper_Clause

[8] http://www.naturalnews.com/046630_CDC_whistleblower_public_confession_Dr_William_Thompson.html

[9] https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/02/19/incredible-pandemic-hoax-from-the-ministry-of-truth/

[10] https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/05/14/my-interview-with-former-cbs-star-reporter/

[11] https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/news/20091112/over-22-million-in-us-had-h1n1-swine-flu#1


-

***********^***********
Keywords:

 

Popularity:   message viewed 2793 times
URL:   http://www.curezone.org/blogs/fm.asp?i=1967283

<< Return to the standard message view