There are about fifty titles in the entire United States Code, however, you will only need volume one, which you will buy from the U.S. Government Printing Office Bookstore. The first volume of the United States Code puts the Constitution of the United States in its proper context and order — the Constitution of the United States is the last of the four Organic Laws of the United States of America.
The Constitution is preceded by the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776,[4] the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787." Ed Rivera
June 7th, 2014 -
You can download all four Organic Laws from the United States House of Representatives' Office of the Law Revision Counsel:
http://uscode.house.gov/browse/frontmatter/organiclaws&edition=prelim
May 4, 2012 -
I have my copy of the "United States Code" (USC) volume one of the "2006 Edition" as of this afternoon. On the title page of this volume, the very first line under the line that reads: "VOLUME ONE" is: "Organic Laws" ...
"Contents" is listed on Page V: Preface, Editor's Note, Table of Title and Chapter Headings then: "Organic Laws of the United States" followed by the Titles.
In the Preface on Page VII it says: "By statutory authority this edition may be cited 'U.S.C. 2006 ed.'"
On page XLIII one can read: "The Organic Laws of The United States of America". That page is immediately followed by "the four Organic Laws ..." just as Ed has stated above.
May 26, 2012 -
The written Organic Laws are the foundation of all written law in America and limits all written law to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America. All 4 Organic Laws, The Declaration of Independence of July 4,1776, the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 and the Constitution of September 17, 1787 are cited in Vol. 1 of both the United States Code (pgs. 43 to 71) and the Statutes at Large (pgs. 1-22) with the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 enacted as 1 Stat. 50 (pgs. 50-53) which and are recognized as enacted positive law. ...
June 28, 2012 -
An Online -CITE-
THE ORGANIC LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/organiclaws.txt
October 27, 2014 -
"There are two Constitutions: “this Constitution” and the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution referred to in the Constitution as “this Constitution” is, of course, a written constitution referred to in the Preamble as “this Constitution for the United States of America.” The Constitution of the United States is obviously not this Constitution.":
http://edstudents.angelfire.com/
The very best support for "every serious student" is:
http://organiclaws.org/
***********^***********
The main subject of this presentation has been said by various attorneys and law professors, as the most important find of the last 200 years of America’s history.":
http://freeinhabitant.info/?p=40
Page XLIX (USC) has Articles of Confederation - 1777 wherein Article IV states "The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants[1] of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from justice exempted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States ..."
I am a free inhabitant who is domiciled on the land in California.[2]
These four Organic Laws deserve to be the top four listed in "The Results of The People's Vote: The most influential documents in American history.":
http://www.ourdocuments.gov/content.php?page=vote
Only two of these are: "#1: Declaration of Independence (1776)" with 29,681 votes and "#2: Constitution of the United States (1787)" with 27,070 votes. "The Articles of Confederation (1777)" is at #15 with 5,785 votes. "The Northwest Ordinance (1787)" is at #38 with 1,844 votes. Given the reality of the government education system, I can understand how the less recognized status of these last two mentioned Organic Laws could be assessed lower in importance than what I believe the Organic Laws deserve among "the most influential documents in American history". IMO - this indicates a significant discrepancy that needs to be overcome and most probably outside of the education system.
I'd especially like to raise the assessment level that is indicated in the votes for the Declaration of Independence even though it did make the #1 position. That is because only "75.9 percent ... named this document as one of the most influential in American history." I think we need to do better than "75.9 percent" since this is the first Organic Law! Doesn't this percentile translate into a letter grade of "D"? In any case I can't imagine what the 24.1 percent are thinking! What other "most influential document" could possibly be more important in American history than the Declaration of Independence? It is the cornerstone of the Organic Laws and as such it deserves to be 100% universally recognized as the number one most influential document to American freedom and probably to the universal cause of freedom as well!
The "Declaration of Independence" is verifiably recognized as the first Organic Law of the United States of America. It is therefor binding upon all the governments throughout the several states as well as throughout the Federal government. This Law says "... these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent States ...". Black's Law Dictionary (in my fifth edition) says:
"Free. See Freedom. - Freedom. The state of being free; liberty; self-determination; absence of restraint; the opposite of slavery.
The power of acting, in the character of a moral personality, according to the dictates of the will, without other check, hindrance, or prohibition than such as may be imposed by just and necessary laws and the duties of social life. ..."
Do you live in a "Free State"?
The First Organic Law also says: "We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness ...". What is "Liberty"? My Black's fifth says: "... exemption from extraneous control. Freedom from all restraints except such as are justly imposed by law. Freedom from restraint, under conditions essential to the equal enjoyment of the same right by others ...".
This phrase: "equal enjoyment of the same right" needs to be seen in light of the First Organic Law so that we all can understand how all our rights to: "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" are entitled to this "freedom from all restraints ...". The only exceptions are lawful restraints that are "justly imposed". What might those restraints be? If government's first duty is to protect the Rights of the People then these lawful restraints can only be ones that are essential for the preservation of the Rights of others who are entitled to the "equal enjoyment of the same right"!:
http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=1833367
Every free American inhabitant or Citizen of any of the free states has a Right to this kind of liberty!
Got Liberty? If so then it would have to be that you are exercising your exemption from extraneous control!
However, if you have declared yourself to be a "United States citizen" that may be a different story. This is due to the fact that the "citizen of the United States" is a Federally created and controlled status (as of the Fourteenth Amendment). Those citizens are "subject to the jurisdiction" of "the United States" - Federal government (and its extensions that have been adopted by the several states). The limitations on that status are severe enough that many of us say those citizens are not free. The status of these citizens has even been referred to as a legalized form of slavery. (That seems understandable when these citizens are coerced into paying a federal income tax even if they are not engaged in either an activity that is lawfully subject to federal income taxation or otherwise subject to the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the federal government.) Consequently many of these citizens have renounced that status!
IMHO - The antidote to the "color of law" issues that are mentioned in the most previous post, and with several current examples (that are specific to the small family farm crisis) presented in the documentary: Farmageddon, begins by knowing the Organic Laws. And yet - "Today, most people have never heard of the Articles of Confederation or the Northwest Territorial Ordinance. Although virtually everyone has heard of the “Declaration of Independence,” virtually no one realizes it is not merely an interesting historical document but is, in fact ... the Law ..."
http://adask.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/the-organic-laws-of-the-united-states-o...
A Comment there supporting this thinking:
"... Volume 1 of the United States Code ... includes the four Organic Laws. A statement by Dennis Hastert is set before their printing in the following pages. Hastert states: 'this edition is a consolidation of the general and permanent laws of the United States in force on January 2, 2001….'. Signed Dennis Hastert, Speaker of the House of Representatives. - I count this volume 1 as indispensable hard evidence existing for every student of the laws of liberty and I maintain it in my possession. This volume 1 is credible evidence affirming the ... Organic Laws are all in effect today ..."
Dear American people! Get a copy of the Organic Laws! Amazon lists some editions of "volume 1" however most appear to be "unavailable". That prompted my general search and success finding: "THE ORGANIC LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA":
http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/organiclaws.txt
You can now download and print that! If you start by reading the first and the last paragraphs of each of these documents you will have a real introduction to the Organic Laws!
Also consider:
"Four Pillars of Constitutionalism: The Organic Laws of the United States":
http://www.amazon.com/Four-Pillars-Constitutionalism-Organic-United/dp/157392...
I just bought a used copy! There are more copies at Amazon starting at $0.05! It could possibly be cheaper (and more supportive to your understanding) to buy this book (than to print pages from the house.gov site)! You'll get a narrative on this as well!
July 8, 2011 -
Three fourths into this "narrative" and it is excellent! There are sources referred to that inspire my continued study on this theme of the whole (four-foldness) of the Organic Laws!
"... the Constitution (and the rest of the Organic Laws) still exists, so that it can (& needs to) be studied; because it is worthless if people do not understand who they are.":
http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=1201183
April 3, 2012 -
"Wanna know something only a handful of people know?
The bigger corruption has been going on for quite some time. Example: George Washington was inaugurated in 1789. The first instance of United States in actual LAW is 1776. Per the Constitution, George Washington needed to be 14 years a resident of the United States in order to take the Article 6th Oath. Run the math: 1776+14=1790. Whoops!!!
So what did he do? Answer: 1 - NOT subscribe the Article VI oath which would have made the constitution binding upon him. Nope… 2 - He took the Article II oath as President of the United States…which is an employee of Congress oath to protect and defend what amounts to federal territory.[3] Clever eh?
Congress quickly patterned ALL oaths after the Article II oath so as to in essence NOT make the written constitution binding on anyone in office. And now you know why Obama ignores the document and why GW Bush refereed to it as ‘just a g-damn piece of paper.’. I am SURE both were given the secret handshake of insider information when they entered the office. {Recall when VP Dick Chaney in essence stated the same thing when he said he was Legislative Branch? He gave you a hint.}
Learn more from a law and government expert at:
http://www.edrivera.com
Another source points out this need to learn:
"unless one understands the original intentions of the Founding Scoundrels who met in secret conclave in 1787 to conspire against the freedoms of the American people, one KNOWS NOTHING about the Constitution and is unqualified to write one line about the damnable document" in this article:
"US Constitution and the Founding Scoundrels":
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=74897
Just found July 18, 2015 -
"The Constitutional Hoax
By Arthur D. Robbins
Posted on February 28, 2014:
http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/12310#sthash.ETtHVEj4.1CLOouHL.dpuf
"We are told that Geo. Washington was the first president, skipping ten others before him. There is a ten year gap in the political history of America. Why??":
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=20039
Now for something different!:
Check out this "entertaining animation: George and Barry discuss the Organic Laws of the United States of America":
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/12359809/the-organic-laws-of-the-united-state...
On 6/29/2011 11:08 PM, (A friend) wrote re: "New FDA Law":
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=90472
I responded:
"... all so called 'FDA law' must be understood in all the available light that is shinning through the entirety of the Organic Laws with a special emphasis on all the jurisdictional limitations that the Organic Laws places on government. If people do not understand this then they are without a compass and without rudder! ..."
Later I noted: "a compass and a rudder" are essential when out on sea. If the "law" we are dealing with is Admiralty and if we don't know that then we are without a compass and a rudder and therefore lost at sea! However, and most fortunately, there is land in the Organic Laws! It is essential to not assume but to really know what land/s these Laws refer to!
"... The Constitution defines and limits the powers of the federal and national government.[2] Those powers, all of which are enumerated, do not include socialistic agricultural subsidy programs,... Under the Constitution, Congress is not authorized to pass any law it chooses, it is only authorized to pass laws that are written and those written laws must be read within the jurisdictional limits enumerated in the Organic Laws. All anyone has to do who doubts the intent of the Founders (to restrict federal and national powers & thereby protecting the rights of the individual) is to read and understand the Organic Laws in sequence.:
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Republic_vs_Democracy.htm
"The representatives which assembled in Philadelphia in May, 1787, to attend the Constitutional Convention met for the primary purpose of improving the commercial relations among the States, although the product of the Convention produced more than this. But, no intention was demonstrated for the States to surrender in any degree the jurisdiction so possessed by the States at that time, and indeed the Constitution as finally drafted continued the same territorial jurisdiction of the States as existed under the Articles of Confederation. The essence of this retention of state jurisdiction is embodied in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, which reads as follows:
'To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings.'":
http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl08.shtml
The Federal government has Lawful jurisdiction only over what it Lawfully owns. (It has purchased certain lands, certain buildings and property in addition to the ten square mile land site for the District of Columbia that was granted by the several states. It can own Federal corporations that Congress has created.) What it owns is defined and limited. The states have their Lawful jurisdictions over what they own that is separate from what is Federally owned. Last but not least private individuals, free inhabitants throughout the fifty states have what they own. The Rights to their property is to be protected by the state and the Federal governments.
"Remember Congress writes laws for itself and its possessions. The States write Laws for themselves. No State law can be used in another State. No State law can be used in the United States, i.e American Samoa, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, etc., etc., and Washington, D.C.. You cannot take D.C. or Puerto Rico law and use it in any State of the Union.":
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/03/19/informer-myth-and-reality-just-who...
Once you know what Law is being used and you know the "ground" where you are standing you can effectively question authority. Once jurisdiction is challenged there is a Lawful burden-of-proof placed upon that "authority". They then have to prove that they indeed have jurisdiction over you! Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time but the very best time is at the start of the original contact.
"... In a Republic, the sovereignty resides in the people themselves, whether the one or the many, and one may act on his own or through his representatives as he chooses to solve a problem. And similarly, one remains free to exercise his or her Rights without government interference, or interference from the many. Here the people have no obligation to the government; instead, the government being hired by the people is obliged to its owner, the people. ":
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Republic_vs_Democracy.htm
Just received: "The Victory For State Sovereignty - Mack/Printz v. USA - The monumental Supreme Court case that restored the Tenth Amendment - Abridged, with forward and summary by Sheriff Richard Mack"
(order at:
http://www.SheriffMack.com)
"[T]he Commerce Clause ... authorizes Congress to regulate interstate commerce directly, it does not authorize Congress to regulate state governments' regulation of interstate commerce." 505 U.S., at 166.:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-1478.ZO.html
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=505&invol=144
Re: territorial terms used in Federal law:
According to Dr. Ed Rivera (http://www.edrivera.com/):
"If you look up the word 'state' in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/Rule1.htm
you will find what they mean when it says 'federal and state
court.' Rule 1 (b)(9) 'state' includes the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States.
Also Rule 54 (c) 'State' includes District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, territory and insular possessions.
Also Rule 47 Supreme Court Rules Reference to 'State Court' and 'State Law' - The term 'state court' when used in these Rules, include the District of Columbia Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the courts of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the local courts of Guam. Reference in these Rules to the statutes of a State includes the statutes of District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Territory of Guam.
So if you are starting to understand that word 'state' does not include the several states, the 50 states, you understand that the United States government has been misapplying the laws in the several states upon state citizens.
Just remember that there are 51 jurisdictions that apply. The 50 state territories and then the federal territories where congress has exclusive jurisdiction. Such as Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or any territory or possession of the United States.
Just remember that United States means federal and united States means the several States.
The United States can have territories and possessions nearly anywhere, even within the several States. They are called insular possessions when they are within the several states. Post offices, Military bases, Federal Parks, DNR, National Forests and so on. ...
This is where the United States government has jurisdiction to bring you into their legislative courts and prosecute you.
The only way they can acquire the land and jurisdiction is to have reserved it when the state came into the unlon or from a state legislature grant under Art. I sec. 8 cl. 17 of the constitution.
So with all that said I hope you understand that the word United States means federal and the laws of Congress only apply in federal territory. Supreme Court case law says in Caha v. United States 'The laws of congress do not apply within the territorial limits of the states but have force only within the national government.'"
"The Tenth Amendment is the foundation of the Constitution." - Thomas Jefferson:
The following quote by Thomas Jefferson is from a letter to George Washington, February 15, 1791, "Opinion on Bill for Establishing a National Bank", in which Jefferson references the Tenth Amendment as the "foundation of the Constitution."
The exact quote:
"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground: That 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.' To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of any definition."
Manuscript:
Transcription:
Also quoted:
http://www.oklahomaconstitution.com/ns.php?nid=174&pastissue=10
"Everything the corporation uses is a TERM of Law". If you are going to respond to legal presentments then you need to know what all the terms in that presentment mean. Legalese is a separate language and needs to be considered as essentially foreign to the conventional American English that non-lawyer type Americans have been speaking since they were children. Every term has it's own special meaning and you can not assume you know what it means. Terms like "person", "individual" and many more are special legal terms that do not mean the same thing as you have know them to mean.
Know the terms, know who and where you are and you will have a better understanding as to whether or not a presentment truly applies to you!
More re: terms:
http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=1340367
"Why do people obey unjust laws?"
"I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces. ...":
http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=1331148
"Our leaders, being politicians, are not leaders at all but are bound to be followers, who just won't be there for us in a crisis. So, it's up to me and you to make the choice of becoming responsible stewards of the earth.":
http://curezone.com/blogs/fm.asp?i=1298669
Commented at this article:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-elite-are-not-even-trying-to-hi...
Then there is the matter of Corporate law:
"Corporate law is a totally different animal from common law.":
http://urbansurvival.com/nl11272004a.htm#corps
Although this blog started with knowing the law, the actual cornerstone in this whole picture is to "Know who you are". If you are open to knowing that then consider the story of Madame Ghis:
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/01/18/website-videos-i-remember-who-i-am...
***********^***********
July 15th, 2014 -
"The Declaration of Independence, as the first document of our organic law, presents a spiritual
formal statement of the relationship between God the Creator, the People and their government.
People have God given rights and these rights are as permanent and glorious as only God can
make them. When government stops protecting those rights it is the duty of the people to alter or
abolish that government. The purpose of government is to protect and secure these Rights.
Furthermore, if a form of government becomes destructive of the Rights of the People it is the
Right of the People to alter or abolish it.":
http://famguardian.org/PublishedAuthors/Govt/TaxHonestyPersecution/Rivera/DrRiveraLesson1And2.pdf
***********^***********
August 17th -
Professor Ed Rivera:
"The United States Supreme Court requires proof of authority in assertions of power by anyone dealing with a person claiming government authority. See Federal Crop Insurance Corporation v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947)
[5A]
In every situation where there is a claim of government authority, that authority will be limited to the territory described in Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787.
Knowledge of the limitations of government requires a complete comprehension of the Organic Laws of the United States of America. To receive a complete set of searchable Organic Laws, contact me at edrivera at symbol edrivera dot com [5B]
I can't tell you just how enormously grateful I am to be a student of Professor Rivera's and a member in the Organic Law Institute! I've just received the first part of the final lesson in "the Basic Course in Law and Government" that Dr. Rivera says is "a serious investigation into the claim of authority for the entity generally known as 'the federal government'.” The serendipity on this is profound as I had just visited a "natural law" site where I commented with reference to the "Organic Laws" (as they appeared to be "missing" from the "Lawful Remedy" offered by the author at that site). The serendipity is most profound as the newly released Lesson 10 addresses the very issue of true law and its application including verification on government's greatest lies that have veiled Americans from knowing the true limitations of governmental jurisdiction!
The Professor says the lesson is "... instruction on reading the law — Organic Law, the highest form of law for government."
***
September 9, 2015 -
"... a perfect introduction to ... 'This Constitution' ..."
https://organiclaws.org/introduction-to-this-constitution/?utm_source=Organic%20Laws%20Update&utm_campaign=afe6375dbc-9_7_15_9_7_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4c3080ecc3-afe6375dbc-51507105
***
September 12th -
Revisiting:
https://adask.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/the-organic-laws-of-the-united-states-of-america/
View Chef Jemichel's profile***
April 15, 2017 -
“The totality of the limited or exclusive legislative power conferred upon Congress by a particular provision of the Constitution, and the respective geographic area in which such power obtains, consists of:
'power of personal and subject-matter legislation throughout the Union and upon the high seas at Art, I, § 8, cl. 1-16;
'power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation over (what will be) the District of Columbia at Art, I, § 8, cl. 17; and
'constructive (implied) power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation at Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 in the form of "Rules and Regulations," id., "respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States," id., i.e., federal territories and enclaves.":
https://supremecourtcase.wordpress.com/2017/04/14/houston-irs-summons-case-exposes-linchpin-of-judicial-authority-scam-lufkin-motion-to-vacate-final-judgment-update/
***********^***********
Footnotes:
[1]
"Some say SSN must be used to get State ID and Passport, which also identifies you as a US citizen (subject), this man shows that a 'free inhabitant' pursuant with Article IV of the Articles of Confederation can get the same and stay independent just as promised in 1776.":
http://freeinhabitant.info/?p=37#comment-8222
[2]
"There are two basic dimensions to the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal government. The first dimension has to do with the powers of the federal government. The second dimension has to do with the area or territories where these powers may be applied. The powers of the U.S. federal government are defined in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution as follows: ..."
http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl08.shtml
"The intent of Amendments Nine and Ten is to limit the federal government to only the powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution. ...
The second dimension of federal jurisdiction - the areas or territories where these powers may be applied - is defined by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 ... and by Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, which states: 'The Congress shall have the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States... '
The territorial jurisdiction of the federal government is limited to the ten square miles of Washington DC, military installations where States have explicitly ceded jurisdiction to the federal government, and territories such as Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa."
***
January 20th, 2016 -
The full extent of the “Territory or other Property belonging to the United States”[id. at Article IV § 3(2) United States Constitution (USC)] today is the collective of:
DC;
Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, Palmyra Atoll, Wake Atoll, Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Midway Atoll, North Island – JACADS, Sand Island, Kingman Reef, and Navassa Island
[2]; and any other “Places purchased . . . for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful buildings” [id. at 1 § 8(17) USC]
in a "Petition for Writ of Certiorari" that "asks the United States Supreme Court to find the United States District Court without territorial jurisdiction over the Petitioner's real property."
***
[3] http://www.mountvernon.org/research-collections/digital-encyclopedia/article/presidential-election-of-1789/
[4] "The Declaration of Independence describes an America where men and women are free to be governed exclusively by their Creator and the English common law. Article IV of the Articles of Confederation secures individual freedoms by restraining the assertion of power by the States of the first Union.":
http://reallibertarianism.com/law-pages/using-the-organic-laws-to-...
[5A] "... Whatever the form in which the Government functions, anyone entering into an arrangement with the Government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the Government stays within the bounds of his authority" - See more at:
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/332/380.html#sthash.HYAuUKao.dpuf
[5B] http://reallibertarianism.com/law-pages/using-the-organic-----
***********^***********
October 31, 2011 -
"Reformation day"! I am sending this message to Congress regarding a secret farm bill that Food Democracy Now asks us to stop:
The Declaration of Independence, based on Self-evident Truths that are eternal, proclaimed the American People free from written law!
Acts of Congress are limited to lands and territories that Congress owns.
The several states in the union retain their original Sovereignty.
Each state has authorized only certain limited powers to Congress that are well defined and that are written in plain English in the Constitution to which every Congressman is (morally, ethically and legally) "bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution".
In contrast - there is no Law that obligates a sovereign American Citizen to any specific performance under an Act of Congress.
Therefore the American farmers who farm their own land in any of the several states of the unlon are free to farm as they please as a fundamental Right to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of their Happiness!
***********^***********
June 16, 2018 -
Questions were raised in the comments regarding Washington's oath at the forum for Anna.[4]
-
***
May 5, 2012 Update -
Just posted the following comment at:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Wisconsin-Raw-Milk-Association/218055891543976
"Food Sovereignty" is for and comes from the people's sovereignty. Therefore, people need to fully know all that can be known that affirms their sovereignty. "The Constitution" is one and only one of four Organic Laws. If you do not know this fact and what these Organic Laws consist of then I freely offer you an informative lesson on this.
I provided the link to this blog.
***********^***********
Remember!:
"Every serious student of the Constitution of September 17, 1787 should have a copy of volume one of the United States Code, ..." Thank You Ed Rivera!
***********^***********
Update May 3, 2012 -
Left a comment at this site (and we'll have to see if it takes). I linked to this blog:
http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/how-to-ruin-a-kids-life/comment-page-1/#commen...
***********^***********
"In a republican nation whose citizens are to be led by reason and persuasion and not by force, the art of reasoning becomes of first importance." -
-Thomas Jefferson to David Harding, 1824
***********^***********
May 20th, 2014 -
We are experiencing the last days of an out of control government based on a military government model, if we cannot prove convincingly that George Washington led a military coup, under cover of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, we may be stuck with bad government for another 200 years. - Ed Rivera
***
November 22, 2015 -
The Organic Laws are published in the United States Code 2012 edition.:
http://uscode.house.gov/download/annualhistoricalarchives/pdf/OrganicLaws2012/index.html
***
October 25, 2016 -
In addition to having a hard copy of the "Organic Laws" as published at the front of Volume 1 of the United States Code the volume will also include a very important code subsection: 4 USC § 72. I consider this a must read for any American individual who wishes to recover their natural status as a "free inhabitant" - free of the presumptions of external government. The following is a most excellent presentation on why I consider this a "must read".
4 USC § 72 as it applies to jurisdiction
[Has Congress "expressly" extended the authority of the DOJ outside "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere" pursuant to 4 USC § 72? If so, please forward to me the United States law which so "expressly" extends the authority of the DOJ. NOTE: At least 20 U.S. Attorneys have been asked for this and not one has been forthcoming with said United States law. The expression "without United States" is being addressed here.]
. 4 U.S.C. § 72, which is positive law, mandates that all offices of government are restricted to "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere" unless Congress "expressly" extends said jurisdiction to other areas by United States law.
"All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law." 4 U.S.C. § 72
United States law 4 U.S.C. § 72 provides the litmus test for the jurisdiction of every office attached to the seat of government; which includes the Department of Justice and any other "offices attached to the seat of government".
4 U.S.C. § 72 is concerned with "where" offices of the United States can exercise their authority. The breakdown of this law is as follows:
1. ALL offices attached to the seat of government are contemplated in this law and not just some offices – this includes the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), etc.;
2. The provisions of 4 U.S.C. § 72 are made mandatory by Congress by its use of the word "shall." In other words, this is not an optional consideration for any United States officer or Agency.
3. The "exercise" of ALL government offices is by default limited to "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere." In other words, "the District of Columbia" is the starting place for jurisdiction not the exception;
4. An exception can be made to the limited jurisdiction of ALL offices attached to the seat of government to "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere." As set forth in 4 U.S.C. § 72, authority to act outside "the District of Columbia" must be "otherwise expressly provided by law." In other words, if Congress intends to extend the authority of a particular office of the United States to areas outside "the District of Columbia," it shall "expressly" delegate and extend said authority in United States law.
5. Any "expressly" delegated exception to the limitations of an officer's authority to that of "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere" is to be authorized by Congress in "law." In other words, since Congress (Legislative Branch) has the exclusive authority to create law for the United States, said exceptions will be found only in United States law and not in Codes of Regulations (Executive Branch) or in Supreme Court rulings (Judicial Branch). Only Congress by United States law can authorize or extend the authority of any government office outside "the District of Columbia," pursuant to 4 U.S.C. § 72.
One of the key words in 4 U.S.C. § 72 is the word "expressly." This means that when Congress extends the authority of any office or officer of the United States outside "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere," Congress will do it by "expressly" extending the Secretary's authority and by leaving no doubt that said authority has been "expressly" extended by Congress to an area outside "the District of Columbia, and not elsewhere." (read "without United States") The definition of "expressly" from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. is as follows:
"In an express manner; in direct and unmistakable terms; explicitly; definitely; directly. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Hill, 336 Mo. 17, 76 S.W.2d. 685, 689. The opposite of impliedly. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co., 144 Ohio St. 195, 58 N.E.2d. 381, 396."[1]
***
January 7, 2017 -
Establish your superior status as an American Citizen (over that of United States citizen):
http://americansrepublicparty.org/page10.php
***
April 18, 2017 -
"Business Letter to U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sessions" includes additional information on the matter of your true status vs "US citizen"[2]
***
April 27, 2017 -
"in a REAL crime, there is the potential to prove an actual injury to some specific person, their rights, or their property, as the result of intent or negligence."[3]
***********^***********
Notes:
[1] Go to http://americansrepublicparty.org
and click on "affidavit templates" in the middle of the top menu bar. That will bring you to:
http://americansrepublicparty.org/page36.php
Scroll down to the 20th link: "Without United States" and that will give you a text document as above.
[2] http://www.paulstramer.net/2017/04/business-letter-to-us-attorney-jeffrey.html
[3] From a two-page report circulated by a private party regarding their court proceeding.
[4] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/05/george-washingtons-oaths.html#more
[5] http://www.titanians.org/tag/taxation/
[6] http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/04/the-bond-companyinsurer-black-rock-inc.html
-
***********^***********
Keywords:
Articles of Confederation, northwest ordinance, Declaration of Independence, This Constitution, organic laws, Four Pillars of Constitutionalism, constitutional republic, question authority, question jurisdiction, occupy America, free inhabitant, god given rights, constitutional hoax, proof of authority, organic laws