calcium revisited

I need to decalcify and wasn't sure if calcium, even in the right form, is always good to take.

So I read threw newports posts on calcium and only one time he suggested to stop taking calcium, for daemon who did some detoxing before...//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1486884#i

What made me curious was this statement in another post:
"This trio for calcium issues are; Fluoride, Mercury and Lead. The first two alter the brain triggers that tell the body what to do the third sneaks into the pathways instead..."
//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1545985#i


If I'm mercury or fluoride toxic, wouldn't this mean that even negative charged calc could go to the wrong places?

Here's another one: "The Calcium part is hogwash, there is no such thing as toxic levels of negative charged calc but to see what happens when calc is oxidized by Hg or whatever see:
http://homeoint.org/books/boericmm/c/calc.htm"

//www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1753320#i


Again, the question is: If my body is a garbage bag full of metals and pathogens, and I belive it is, will calcium supplementation be doing more harm than good?

If I figure this out, my next struggle will be getting rid of calcium already deposited in all the wrong places. I'll get IP6 and calcium co-factors, and hope it takes care of the problem but taking calcium in the meantime seems counterproductive, or doesn't it? Tweet