Re: Good article
Forum: Supplements Debate
- Vitamin E Trials “Fatally flawed”
R by Corinthian
- Good article
- Re: Good article
|I had not read your article, till now. I take a few exceptions with some of the things you write.|
Biological effect, Therapeutic Effect, Pharmacological Effect, Toxic Effect.
These terms need to be kept in mind when discussing or studying dosing. Scientists tend to be conservative when deciding on dosage and evidently it has led to this situation. However, since mega dosing can also have toxic effects, finding the correct dosage is not as easy as one would imagine. Trying to focus in on that sweet spot is not simple, and as I mentioned in my article about caffeine and exercise; more is not always better. So, just upping the dosage does not guaranteed a more powerful effect, and it could even have toxic consequences as in the case with vitamin A.
(Yes repetitive, I know)
Eventually, like in this case with vitamin E, we start zoning in the correct dosage. Or at least figure out that the dose of previous studies has been too low.
I find you argument that there is no money in non patented molecules to be simply wrong. As you know the vitamin/supplement industry rakes in around 10 billion in profit, and pharmaceutical companies control almost all of it. They don't have to spend money on getting them approved or doing trials to prove the safety - it's pure profit. The biggest vitamin/supplements are pharmaceutical companies, so there is plenty of economic incentive to provide reason for their consumers to start buying their products. All without the fear of an over zealous shyster attacking them with a class action suit. Clearly funding these cheap (compared to the development and testing of 1 new drug) studies is in their interest and in fact they are the ones putting the money in many cases. A study showing X is good for Y is quickly seized by their marketing dept. and promoted. We have seen this with lycopene, flaxseed oil, omega 3-6, vitamins, and many others. The sales that these studies generate is pure profit. I also addressed this argument in a previous post :
Alert Webmaster & Moderators|
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
How do you feel about this message?
Hide this question
|DISCLAIMER Information available on this page and on CureZone is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for the advice provided by a healthcare professional or any information contained on or in any product label or packaging. You should not use the information on CureZone for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease, or prescribing any medication or other treatment. Answers, comments and opinions provided on CureZone are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. CureZone does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages, comments or articles on CureZone. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. Read more ...||